There’s an old axiom that describes the purported three options that someone faces when confronted with a threat. “Fight, flight or deal with it.”
Marty Lavin, JD, is one of a few voices in manufactured housing who has publicly called out in digital print the problem of discrimination against manufactured homes where thousands can consider it.
Lavin’s professional history has included involvement in a high volume retail center, land-lease communities, manufactured home lending, and working with a GSE. Lavin made the speaking circuit for years, was featured in the now defunct Manufactured Home Merchandiser Magazine, has periodically contributed for MHProNews, and published himself. He was awarded one of the Manufactured Housing Institute’s (MHI) most coveted awards, the Tataro, for his lifetime of service to the industry in financing.
So when Lavin says that “The HUD Code is a discrimination code,” it’s a phrase that should make industry readers across the spectrum sit up, and take notice. It should raise questions, like what does that mean? We will explore that, and step-by-step see how it leads up to an emerging issue – one that is holding the industry’s sales at bay – related below.
Discrimination Against MH
Ponder for a few moments the fact that modular, prefab, and tiny house builders – those who don’t build manufactured homes – distance themselves from manufactured homes. It isn’t just stick builders, or others in the general public, who attempt to besmirch manufactured housing, often by unjust and inaccurate reference to HUD Code homes as “mobile homes,” or “trailer houses.”
There are regrettably voices within Manufactured Housing that mix the terminology in problematic ways too. The need to correct terminology is real.
It’s a flawed strategy to diminish manufactured housing, or misuse the terminology, said L.A. “Tony” Kovach years ago. It plays into the hands of those who unjustly target any factory-built home.
Which is part of the reason why MHProNews and MHLivingNews periodically use the Steve Duke quote and graphic below.
It is all part of the puzzle that has kept manufactured housing at historically low levels, during an affordable housing crisis.
Fractures Within the Factory Housing Industry
There are several fractures, and conflicts that exist within the ranks of factory builders. Modular homes get trucked in too. Some modular homes have a permanent frame, at times referenced by industry members as “HUDulars,” while other MODs use a detachable carrier. But site-built housing components get trucked to a job-site too. Does that make a site-built house, a trailer or pick up house?
Retailers have been known for decades to target residents in a land lease community for trading in their older manufactured home, encouraging them to buy a new one that would become part of a land-home package. No more “landlord” is part of the argument made in such cases.
Communities have competed with each other for residents, what some have called “poaching.” While unpopular among land-lease community owners, it is arguably free enterprise at work. Deal with it.
Developers of fee-simple land/home projects are impacted too, as the case below will explain.
All of these fractures demonstrate a lack of industry cohesion. But perhaps it is to be expected. Certainly HUD has said that they don’t believe that it’s realistic to expect the industry to speak with one voice. The related report linked below can be read later for additional depth of understanding on the point.
Regardless, all of the above plays into the hands of those in the offices of local jurisdictions who are prepared to discriminate against the sellers of – or providers of home sites for – HUD Code manufactured homes.
Exclusive Hilton Head MH Development
A developer and realtor in posh Hilton Head was recently in their local news for proposing a small development of single family manufactured homes. The owner of the parcel wanted to subdivided it into lots for manufactured homes, to create some more affordable housing there.
Push-back from NIMBY-minded locals was deafening. They said they did not want “a trailer park” [SIC] with “mobile homes” [SIC] in their neighborhood.
The realtor involved with the Hilton Head, SC, development plan told MHProNews that the homesites would be sold fee simple, they are not planned as a land lease. Every home owner would own their own land, the so-called land/home package.
That important detail that the proposed manufactured home development – that it was not going to be a “park” – didn’t seem to matter to locals.
It is an example of the prejudice against manufactured homes being displayed for all who “google the news” about this industry to see. It exemplifies Lavin’s point about the HUD Code being used as a discriminatory target.
While this directly impacts retail sellers of manufactured homes, it impacts factories too, and thus other product and service providers to the industry.
The Hilton Head and other cases like it raise several legal issues. But law suits might cost that property owner in Hilton Head more than the profits from the sale of that parcel of land for development for manufactured homes may be worth. Sam Zell’s point about defending the property line is an apt one.
Zell’s comments on defending the property line, along with other community related comments, are found in the interview linked here.
Developing Trend that Communities and Execs are Telling MHProNews
MHProNews has been virtually alone in reporting to the industry news stories like the one in Wisconsin, where local officials want to shut down a community they don’t like, by non-renewal of their operating license. The details can be read later, in the article linked below.
Tweet Local media originally reported that the tortured odyssey of the Northern Housing Community in Schofield, Wisconsin did not receive a timely appeal. Those initial accounts turned out to be inaccurate. “Your article was very interesting,” said Sarah L. Ruffi, of the Ruffi Law Offices in Wausau, WI. “I represent Northern Mobile Home Park, LLC … Continue reading
That attorney, others, MH Communities professionals, and executives are among those that have called or messaged MHProNews with their insights and concerns on what they described as a “disruptive, emerging trend.”
Community operators have told MHProNews that they’re concerned that local jurisdictions targeting “blighted” properties near their own well-kept ones, which could be later used as a wedge to arguably undermine their license renewal too.
There are multiple cases in various parts of the nation where local officials are in various stages of non-renewal of a community’s license to operate, which would be a prelude to closing a community.
Such a forced closure could be a prelude to redevelopment with far more costly housing, or other forms of development. The biggest losers are arguably the residents, and they routinely say so to local media. The related report about a corrupt practice raised by Fox contributor John Stossel could be playing out in a similar way in MHVille.
TweetIn any industry, trends are worth noting, and are important for investors, owners, lenders, policy pros, and other professionals alike. As the chart below will spotlight, there have been hundreds of manufactured home communities that have opened since 2002. That’s news to many, not to others, in manufactured housing. But how many have … Continue reading
All of the above are examples of what family-community operator Tom Fath has called an industry under assault.
While this impacts producers of manufactured homes indirectly, it is a post-production issue. What have MHI discussions or “task forces” actually done to address such issues?
Tweet “This is why we operate with a “North Star Goal‘, a light that represents the highest aspirations of a business. Like a next-generation mission statement, a North Star Goal orients the identity and direction of a brand, guiding all decisions, strategies, and partnerships.” – Bag the Habit. (emphasis added) The northern star for … Continue reading
What positions will that the emerging new national association for community operators take to address such matters? Their stance could decide how many MHI members, or non-aligned communities, they will attract?
Is the Industry’s Image Being Defined by the Lowest Common Denominator?
Publisher Kovach has been a consultant, service provider, and a multiple award-winning manager/owner involved in the front lines of manufactured home retail and communities for decades. He says that this unjust discrimination against manufactured homes is but another example of how the underlying issues must be dealt with, rather than discussing the symptoms.
Among the reasons that the Daily Business News on MHProNews has spotlighted problems in the industry, is to help industry members fully grasp how officials and the public reacts to stories, like the one in Moscow, Idaho, or the more recent ones coming from Northern Georgia tied to controversial SECO board member, Tom Lackey. The referenced links below can be read later.
TweetThe Digital Journal, International Business Times and dozens of other mainstream media outlets have picked up the following MHLivingNews press release that refutes the slanted claims made in a recent “All Things Considered” radio broadcast and related articles. The Inside MH Road Show and Manufactured Home Living News have featured experts and professionals, but homeowners – including millionaires, those of modest … Continue reading
More than one SECO member has attempted to defend their ‘hands-off Tom Lackey’ position.
One of them said recently that they are trying to lead by example. They attempt to show operators of visually unappealing or problem plagued properties how to upgrade their communities. They don’t want to be cops, policing their own industry.
Understandable. But does that go far enough? And when the SECO planning board members are in the news, drawing problematic headlines, what examples does that set?
weet “We bought a trailer  that wasn’t really ours. I mean, it really hurt me. My nerves have been tore up. I’ve been crying.” – Tonya Evans, a customer of Tom Lackey’s Stoney Pointe MH Community business. Spencer Roane is an RV MH Hall of Fame Inductee, and is one of a group … Continue reading
In Ohio, stories about actual pre-HUD Code mobile homes burning down were used to change their state’s regulatory structure. It was an entirely unjust line of attack. Resident groups and the state association worked together to attempt to preserve the successful regulatory structure.
But in the end, the voices in Ohio pushing a “dangerous dwellings” narrative image won. Those anti-MH naysayers won, even though manufactured homes are safer than site built homes against a fire. The anti-MH voices won despite the fact the incidents cited were true mobile homes. The appearance of MHI VP and general counsel, Rick Robinson made no appreciable difference, did it?
Getting to the Underlying Issues
It is the problematic stories in MHVille that are part of the root causes of the industry’s challenges, argues Kovach. It impacts all, but it is largely a post-production issue.
Each individual business must create a distinction in the minds of the local home buying public. “That’s the opportunity in disguise,” Kovach says.
“Each business, every location, must learn how to effectively define itself. Otherwise, time after time, others will define you, often to your disadvantage.” UMH’s Sam Landy is correct when he says that ultimately, each business must market itself.
But it is also a problem that an effective post-production national association could be utilized to address such challenges.
“Fight, flight or deal with it.” Without dealing with the underlying issues, the industry can expect more of the same. The popular definition of insanity is to keep doing the same things, in the same ways, and expect a different result. ## (News, analysis, and commentary.)
(Third party images, content are provided under fair use guidelines.)
Tweet How can we promote homeownership and sell new homes on leased land and at the same time close communities? It’s like selling tickets to a zoo where ‘only 1 in a 100 are eaten by the lions!’ One way to address this is to segment true homeownership land lease communities and differentiate it from … Continue reading
Tweet Tony, It’s a tough situation. The problem is that it is easier for state and local government to impose rent and/or development restrictions on mobile home parks than to assume responsibility for preserving or creating an adequate supply of affordable housing. This is because it costs money to create affordable housing, which local governments … Continue reading
weetNorth of the border, in Mayerthorpe, Alberta, Canada, in what appears to be another case of NIMBY (Not-In-My-Back-Yard), a housing developer is not pleased about a planned manufactured home community. According to the Mayerthorpe Freelancer, local housing developer Tim Rosadiuk criticized Mayerthorpe’s new manufactured housing subdivision and said there is a lack of good places to build … Continue reading
Tweet The absurdity of publishing only half-truths, ‘happy talk,’ endless self-promotion, and polite platitudes has been on full display in manufactured housing for years. Google’s dictionary defines absurd this way: wildly unreasonable, illogical, or inappropriate – “the allegations are patently absurd” arousing amusement or derision; ridiculous – “gym shorts and knee socks looked absurd … Continue reading