Posts Tagged ‘Government Accountability Office (GAO)’

GAO, House Members Blast Controversial Federal ‘Office of Financial Research’

December 7th, 2017 Comments off

OfficeFinancialResearchFinancialServicesGovtAccountabililtyOffice660The Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations met today to examine the controversial Office of Financial Research (OFR), assessing its management and structure, public work-product, its cooperation with Congress, and support of the Financial Stability Oversight Council,” said the House Financial Services Committee in a release to the Daily Business News.

In September 2014, the House Committee on Financial Services requested that GAO review OFR, an office within the Department of the Treasury,” said the Government Accountability Office (GAO) in a separate media release to MHProNews.

Among other things, GAO was asked to assess the agency’s usefulness to regulators and Congress in assessing systemic risk in the financial system and any delays or set-backs in its major undertakings. GAO subsequently initiated a review of OFR in January 2015,” said the GAO.

The GAO added, that “However, during the course of its review, GAO encountered substantial delays in obtaining access to agency officials and information. Separately, whistleblower allegations and an ongoing Treasury OIG investigation led GAO to terminate the engagement.”

GAO closed by noting that: “GAO’s decision to terminate the engagement without issuing a product,” meaning, they were done chasing the OFR for details.

The GAO previously issued a largely favorable report on manufactured housing, linked below.

14 Years – Time to Revisit the Manufactured Housing Improvement Act of 2000?

OFR Director Richard Berner appeared as the hearing’s sole witness,” said the Financial Services Committee.

From studies that impugn the workplace culture, to low morale, multiple ongoing investigations, and today’s harsh criticism of OFR by the Government Accountability Office, it appears to both outsiders and insiders that this organization is completely dysfunctional,” said Chairman Ann Wagner (R-MO). “Following these reports of mismanagement, questionable analysis, bureaucratic redundancy, and the inability to fulfill its statutory mandate, one question comes to mind; why does the OFR exist?”

Key Takeaways

  • Eliminating the OFR would improve risk management by encouraging diverse perceptions of rise and more robust risk management strategies.
  • Eliminating the OFR will result in one less redundant federal bureaucracy. There are already countless other federal agencies that perform market surveillance and collect and analyze data for purposes of identifying threats to financial stability.

Both federal statements today underscore the waste, fraud, and abuse that third parties claim cost taxpayers over $600 billion dollars annually. Fixing those problematic losses, cited in the report found as a download in the report linked below, could dramatically cut the federal deficit.

“Fiscal Carnage,” “Calamitous Economic Hole”  Decried by Citizens Advocacy Group

While not directly related, this expose also points to the years of problematic work by the CFPB.  Many in the MH Industry have seen the CFPB as overall harmful to the industry and consumers.  Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling recently reacted strongly to the CFPB dust-up there, for that report, see this link below.

House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling Reacts to CFPB Controversy

We Provide, You Decide.” © ## (News, analysis, commentary, related links.)

Note 1: Thousands get it. For those industry pros, investors, and MH advocates who want to sign up to the manufactured home industry’s leading headline news/updates – typically sent twice weekly – please click here to sign up in just seconds.

(Image credits are as shown above, and when provided by third parties, are shared under fair use guidelines.)

SoheylaKovachManufacturedHomeLivingNewsManufacturedHousingIndustryDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews-Submitted by Soheyla Kovach to the Daily Business News for

Congressional Committee asks for GAO Probe of HUD MH Program

December 1st, 2011 Comments off

MHProNews has received a communique from the Manufactured Housing Association for Regulatory Reform (MHARR) noting a copy of a letter on the stationery of Rep. Spencer Bacchus (R-Ala.), Chairman of the House of Representatives Financial Services Committee, and Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), Ranking Member of the Committee. The letter is addressed to Comptroller General Gene L. Dodaro of the Government Accountability Office (GAO). It is signed by Rep. Judy Biggert (R-IL), Chairman of the Subcommittee on Insurance, Housing and Community Opportunity, and Rep. Bacchus. The letter asks Mr. Dodaro to examine the Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) regulation of the manufactured housing program, specifically the implementation of the Manufactured Housing Improvement Act (MHIA) of 2000 designed to establish standards for construction of MH, and how that has affected the overall MH industry. The MHIA also set the boundaries for federal preemption and allocated resources to deal with MH issues. The letter also asks the agency to examine the effect the Manufactured Housing Consensus Committee (MHCC) has had on revisions to HUD’s guidance of the MH program and what authority the MHCC has in advising HUD. Noting the inspection fee HUD collects from manufacturers, the letter asks the GAO to examine how the fees are collected and administered, if it is being done according to law, and what effect the fees have on production.

(Graphic credit: Wikipedia)

Government Programs Costing More

November 11th, 2011 Comments off

HousingWire reports the cost of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) has risen $10 billion in one year, to $28 billion, according to the Government Accountability Office (GAO). The $28 billion does not include the $29 billion committed to housing initiatives such as HAMP (Home Affordable Modification Program). Housing programs so far have cost $2.8 billion through the third quarter. The GAO says the increase in TARP costs is due to the decrease in the value of the investments the Tresury has in GM, AIG, and Ally Financial. The Treasury Department invested $245 billion in banks and $80 billion in the automobile industry from 2008 through Oct. 3, 2010.

(Graphic credit: Wikipedia)