Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Fannie Mae’

Investigating Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Over Duty to Serve Manufactured Housing

June 13th, 2019 Comments off

 

InvestigatingFannieMaeFreddieMacOverDutytoServeManufacturedHousingDailyBusinessNewsMHproNews

Facts are stubborn things.”

 

Assuming that the meaning of “new” hasn’t changed recently, “new” means “not done before.” And, if “new” still means “new,” then it also means, by definition, that there is no pre-existing loan performance data for that “new” class of home – because it’s … well … “new.” – Mark Weiss, J.D., President and CEO of the Manufactured Housing Association for Regulatory Reform (MHARR).

 

Wit is the soul of wisdom, goes an old maxim.

With that pull quote above from his full message below, Weiss exposes the apparent contradiction of providing Duty to Serve (DTS) lending for the Clayton Homes/Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) backed ‘new class of homes.’

Attentive industry readers will recall that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have said that a ‘lack of data’ caused them to not dive deeply into manufactured home lending, especially on home only or ‘chattel’ personal property loans.  Yet they do have data on those loans. They also have the obvious example of several lender sustainably performing personal property loans.  That’s inferred performance.

By contrast, as Weiss said, the GSEs have no data whatsoever on this Clayton/MHI backed new class of homes.

An outraged MHI-only member producer told MHProNews in 2018 his disgust over how the GSEs snubbed the vast majority of manufactured housing by Fannie and Freddie with this phrase: “What are we chopped liver?”

 

“What Are We, Chopped Liver?” MHI Member December 2018 Reactions

 

Another MHI-only member producer told MHProNews about the same time that the new class of homes makes no sense. Per that source, the GSEs already did lending on par with conventional housing for modular homes.  Why establish this new class of HUD code manufactured homes, when modular housing already exists, and the same producers routinely do both? In a sense, it is arguably like doing nothing at all for manufactured housing, unless it is much the same as an on-frame modular unit.

 

Insider Insights from GSEs

The Daily Business News on MHProNews asked a consultant to a GSE, prior to the roll out of their ‘new class of homes,’ program the following.  Had the GSEs considered what the impact would be on the rest of manufactured housing? And if the ‘new class’ of homes was successful, what if it undermined confidence in the balance of all other manufactured housing?

The reply was stunning. Per that consultant, if a negative impact on other manufactured homes occurred, the GSE could always take that into consideration after a year or so of data was collected.

Rephrased, the consultant said the GSE was willing to risk undermining the value and confidence in all manufactured homes, in order to roll out the new Clayton/MHI backed project as they envisioned it.

Outrageous, but there it is.  Other consultants to GSEs told MHProNews equally stunning revelations.

 

But the focus of this report is the newest edition of MHARR ISSUES AND PERSPECTIVES.  It is being reproduced below in its entirety.  It will be followed by additional insights and commentary by MHProNews.

 

TimeToInvestigateFannieFreddieMishandlingofDutyToServeDTSMHARRissuesPerspectiveManufacturredHousingAssocRegulatoryReformLogo

“TIME TO INVESTIGATE FANNIE AND FREDDIE’S MISHANDLING OF DTS”

By Mark Weiss 

JUNE 2019

It’s been more than ten years since Congress enacted the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA) and its “Duty to Serve Underserved Markets” (DTS) mandate.  DTS directs both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to “develop loan products and flexible underwriting guidelines to facilitate a secondary market for mortgages on manufactured homes for very low, low and moderate-income families.” Insofar as it expressly authorizes programs for both real estate and personal property (chattel) manufactured housing consumer loans, DTS was – and always has been – aimed at increasing the availability (and lowering the cost) of purchase-money financing for mainstream, affordable manufactured homes by providing securitization support for lenders, which would lower their credit risk, while promoting greater market competition, which would also result in lower borrowing costs for consumers. That laudable objective, however, has not been achieved, and with the industry now in an eight-month sustained production decline, DTS remains a nearly empty shell, leaving the 80% of the manufactured housing consumer finance market that relies on personal property loans totally unserved, while scarce – and badly needed – DTS resources are diverted to programs that do nothing for mainstream manufactured housing consumers, but do benefit a handful of the industry’s largest corporate conglomerates. This “hijacking” of DTS, with the knowledge and support of both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, deserves a thorough investigation by Congress and full accountability for those involved.

 

Put simply, DTS was never designed to be a corporate welfare program for the industry’s largest conglomerates. But that is exactly what it’s becoming, as a result of its botched implementation by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (with a “wink and a nod” from their federal regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency – FHFA), and its diversion away from the mainstream, affordable manufactured homes produced by all HUD Code industry manufacturers, in favor of high-dollar, hybrid-type homes that are produced by only one or, at most, just a handful of manufacturers.  As usual, the winners in this fiasco (thus far) are certain well-heeled, well-connected industry conglomerates that play to the pre-existing prejudices of Fannie and Freddie, while the “losers” are the rest of the HUD Code industry and the millions of lower and moderate-income American families that could otherwise be helped by DTS to purchase and own a home of their own.

 

The factual analysis leading to these conclusions is, in actuality, simple, straightforward and fundamentally undisputed.  Start with a basic undisputed fact, as confirmed by federal government data.  That is — as shown by U.S. Census Bureau housing market data — that some 76% of all HUD Code manufactured housing placements in 2017 (the most recent year for which such data is available), were titled as personal property (i.e., chattel). While not necessarily representing a one hundred-percent direct correlation, this data effectively means that something close to three-quarters of the manufactured homes purchased in 2017 were financed as personal property, while only 17% of all manufactured homes that year were titled – and presumably purchased and financed – as real property. This division between personal property-based placement and financing on the one hand, and real estate-based placement and financing on the other, has remained relatively constant in recent years, moreover, with the proportion of personal property placements varying between 76% and 80%, while real estate placements varied between 13% and 17%.  Thus, there can be no actual or legitimate dispute that the vast bulk of the manufactured homes purchased by lower and moderate-income American families, are served by personal property-based chattel financing.

 

Nor is this – or should this — be a surprise to anyone.  While manufactured housing personal property loans generally carry a higher interest rate than real estate-based loans, due, in part, to the absence of land as security for the lender, personal property loans, using the home itself as the sole security for the lender, cost less overall than real estate loans which include the purchase cost of the land underlying the home.  As a result, personal property loans have tended to be favored by lower and moderate-income consumers, including consumers who might otherwise be unable to afford a home of their own. That is, with an average sales price of $48,300.00 without land (in 2017) a single-section manufactured home would cost far less to purchase and finance than either an average site-built home with land (with an average combined sales price of $384,900.00) or a single-section manufactured home with land, which, according to the same data, could add something on the order of $90,000.00 to the structural price of the home itself.  Consequently, even with higher borrowing costs for chattel loans (resulting from higher interest rates), such loans on HUD Code manufactured homes nevertheless represent – and have always represented – the most affordable route to homeownership for any American anywhere in the United States.

 

Given this basic, undisputed data, the most direct route to fulfilling the promise and mandate of DTS – i.e., putting more lower and moderate-income American families into homes that they can truly and legitimately afford – would be for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to provide market-significant securitization and secondary market support for the manufactured housing personal property consumer lending market, as MHARR has always maintained. This is where the vast majority of manufactured housing purchasers are, and where the vast majority of lower and moderate-income manufactured housing purchasers are. And, not to overstate the point, these are the very people that Fannie and Freddie should be serving and, in fact, were created to serve, and are directed to serve by their respective charters and authorizing legislation.

 

But Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have no interest in serving the type of housing consumers served by mainstream manufactured housing. Thus, they have no interest in providing securitization and secondary market support for mainstream, chattel-financed manufactured housing.  If they did have such an interest, and had been serving the mainstream manufactured housing market all along, DTS would not have been necessary and would not have been enacted by Congress.  What need would there be for a remedy – such as DTS — if there was no problem to begin with?  Conversely, the fact that Congress felt the need to enact a remedy shows that there was, in fact, a problem with Fannie and Freddie’s treatment of manufactured housing consumers. But Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, aided by FHFA and some within the industry, have worked overtime to circumvent that remedy, while they continue to discriminate against lower and moderate-income manufactured American families that seek to purchase a truly affordable, mainstream manufactured home. At the same time, Fannie and Freddie talk about support for the mainstream manufactured housing market while, in fact, doing no such thing.

 

How do we know this?  Again, “facts are stubborn things.”  To start with, the reality is that neither Fannie Mae nor Freddie Mac has yet to implement even a “pilot program” for manufactured home chattel loans, some 11 years after the enactment of DTS.  A May 23, 2019 letter from Fannie Mae Vice President Jonathon Lawless to MHARR thus refers only to a “potential” manufactured housing personal property “pilot” program. And forget any kind of market-significant support for the predominate type of manufactured home consumer lending in the United States. In fact, according to sources, Fannie and Freddie have yet to provide market support for any manufactured home consumer personal property loans under DTS – a point effectively confirmed by Mr. Lawless, whose May 2019 letter states that Fannie Mae’s DTS Plan “has never called for [the] immediate purchase and securitization of these [personal property] loans.”

 

And what are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac doing instead?  Rather than providing the type of market support that is desperately needed to expand the availability and affordability of mainstream manufactured homes for lower and moderate-income purchasers – what they should be doing under DTS – Fannie and Freddie instead, are offering support for the types of “manufactured homes” that they want to see and promote; not mainstream, affordable, HUD Code manufactured homes, but “manufactured homes” that are more like the far more costly site-built homes that Fannie and Freddie are accustomed to dealing with. Thus, in a January 14, 2019 article entitled “Delivering on Our Affordable Housing Mission Under Duty to Serve” (and there are many more such examples), Fannie Mae Executive Vice President Jeffrey Hayward refers to “manufactured homes” constructed in accordance with Fannie’s “MH Advantage” program – for manufactured homes titled as real estate (not chattel) – as being “similar to site-built homes.”  And, of course, this is – and remains – Fannie and Freddie’s central criterion in providing support for “manufactured homes” – i.e., they cannot be mainstream (and therefore affordable) manufactured homes but, instead, must be “similar to [the] site-built homes” that Fannie and Freddie are used to dealing with, and thus are within their pre-existing “comfort zone.”

 

It’s the same thing with the so-called “new class” of manufactured homes.  These homes are described (and specified) as being more like site-built homes – or a hybrid between site-built homes and manufactured homes.  As a result, they are projected to cost significantly more than an “average” mainstream manufactured home – up to approximately $220,000.00 as compared with an “average” (2017) price of $71,900.00 for all mainstream manufactured homes (i.e., both single and multi-section) — and are simply not the type of affordable, non-subsidized affordable housing resource that is provided by mainstream manufactured housing; meaning, again, that they would appeal – and be marketed to – the more “upscale” consumers that Fannie and Freddie would prefer to deal with.

 

And just as long as we’re on the subject, what type of loan performance data exits to support the creation of a special program for this supposed “new class” of manufactured home (or “MH Advantage” homes for that matter)?  For more than a decade, Fannie and Freddie have refused to provide any type of DTS support for mainstream manufactured housing personal property loans, citing a lack of “performance data” to justify entry into that market. So, if the availability of “performance data” is thus a prerequisite for market support from Fannie and Freddie under DTS, what type of “performance data” do Fannie or Freddie have for an entirely “new class” of home?

 

Assuming that the meaning of “new” hasn’t changed recently, “new” means “not done before.” And, if “new” still means “new,” then it also means, by definition, that there is no pre-existing loan performance data for that “new” class of home – because it’s … well … “new.” So, for the 80% of the existing, mainstream manufactured housing market financed through chattel loans, no performance data means no DTS support. It means not even a measly “pilot program” after 11 years. But for a “new” class of higher-cost home, being pursued by just a few of the industry’s largest conglomerates (if that many), no performance data means a ticket to instant Fannie and Freddie support – even though there is not one word about a “new class” of manufactured homes or a pilot program for a “new class” of manufactured homes in the DTS implementation plans filed by Fannie and Freddie and approved by FHFA in 2018.  And all of this comes to you courtesy of the same people who nearly crashed the world economy by backstopping trillions of dollars in “subprime” loans on homes that borrowers could not legitimately afford.

 

The reality is that DTS is in the process of being “hijacked” by special interests. It is being diverted from its primary, essential and crucial mission with regard to manufactured housing – to expand the availability of consumer loans for mainstream manufactured housing; to bring more lenders into the market; and to lower the (interest) cost of mainstream manufactured home consumer loans through increased competition and risk reduction for lenders. Fannie and Freddie’s treatment and botched implementation of DTS is an ongoing farce for the industry and an ongoing tragedy for lower and moderate-income Americans who simply wish to purchase a home of their own, but continue to be subjected to flat-out discrimination, in open defiance of Congress and with a knowing, and apparently intentional pass from FHFA. The time has come, therefore, for Congress to re-involve itself in this matter, to conduct a thorough and probing investigation of DTS with respect to manufactured housing, and see to it that the DTS directive is enforced and implemented now, not “honored” in the breach.

 

Mark Weiss

 

MHARR is a Washington, D.C.-based national trade association representing the views
and interests of independent producers of federally-regulated manufactured housing.

 

— ## —

MarkWeissJDPresidentCEOManufacturedHousingAssocRegulatoryReformDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

 

Disclosure

Stating the obvious, let’s nevertheless note as a disclosure that MHARR is a banner advertiser, thus a sponsor of this publication. That noted, Berkshire Hathaway subsidiaries – Clayton Homes, 21st Mortgage Corporation – and the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) were also banner advertisers/sponsors of this site – which is the industry’s largest and most read manufactured home trade media by far. Our fact-checks of MHI, et al began while they were advertisers. Our fact-checks began years before MHARR became a sponsor.  Therefore, we have a clearly established record of covering matters as we see them.

It must also be noted that while we were doing such fact-checks and analysis, that MHI’s elected and staff leaders were publicly praising MHProNews.

 

 

 

TimWilliams21stMortgagePublicationDailyBusinessNewsMHProNewsMHLivingNews

HowardWalkerEmergenceOfTonyKovachsPublicationsProfessionalsFilledVacuumDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

 

Our publisher – L. A. ‘Tony’ Kovach – has also stated several times in ‘digital print’ that in hindsight, he now sees the disconnects.  For example, there was Warren Buffett’s very public support of candidates who signed into law and worked to protect from any changes the Dodd-Frank legislation that gave birth to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Meanwhile, Clayton Homes, 21st Mortgage, other Berkshire Hathaway brands, and MHI all spent years and millions of dollars ‘opposing,’ lobbying, and fighting to modify. A detailed review of that ‘Rope-a-Dope’ is linked here. That fact-check and analysis includes this following stunning admission by a former MHI SVP who could not have been clearer. The years of efforts that lied ahead were a waste of time and money.

 

JasonBoehlertManufacturedHousingInstituteSeniorVPLogoMHIlogoQuoteMHProNews

WarrenBuffettPhotoPresidentBarackObamaPhotoMemeCartoonManufacturedHousingIndustryMHProNews

Satirical cartoons can illustrate meaningful points.

WarrenBuffettPresidentBarackObamaPhotoMemeManufacturedHousingIndustryMHProNews

 

The Common Threads?

The common thread between DTS and the never-enacted Preserving Access to Manufactured Housing Act are access to financing. Our publisher stressed that the principle behind Preserving Access – or DTS – are fine. In the case of Preserving Access, while it was a ‘good idea,’ it was also all but guaranteed to fail. There was no practical logic in pursuing it.

What has been occurring with DTS is similar. So Weiss’ points are timely.

An MHI-only member connected source that’s worked with the GSEs has told MHProNews that part of what caused Fannie and Freddie from not implementing DTS in the aftermath of the passage of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act (HERA) 2008 was the relatively poor performance of 21st Mortgage Cop and Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance (VMF) lending.

Now, given the mainstream housing mortgage/credit meltdown, that ‘relatively poor’ has to be considered in the broader context.  After all, lending did return to conventional housing, despite the scandals that occurred.  Manufactured homes had negligible impact on the 2008 housing/mortgage crisis that trigged the so-called ‘great recession’ that rippled through the world’s economy.

As a former MHI connected executive has said, manufactured home lending and past losses were a “pimple on an elephant’s ass” compared to what happened with conventional housing.

 

“An Elephant Ass,” Understanding GSEs, Duty to Serve, Manufactured Home Lending

 

Let’s recall that the 2008 housing/mortgage crisis was not the first such event.  The S&L crisis was smaller by comparison, but had an estimated $160 billion finance impact.

 

SavingsLoansCrisisWikiDailyBusinessNewsMHproNews

 

Within that context, what’s noteworthy is that per various sources, Berkshire owned lenders de facto helped derail the use of DTS early after its passage and were a source of an excusing DTS now on virtually all but this new class of homes.

21st, Clayton, and Warren Buffett de facto revealed their responsibility for their harmful impact on manufactured home lending which caused thousands of retailers and some producers to go out of business.

SmokingGunEvidenceOfAntiTrustMonopolisticCollusionMoatClaytonHomesKevinClayton21stMortgageTimWilliamsWarrenBuffettMHLivingNewsMHProNews

In a series of direct quotes in context, a document from 21st Mortgage signed by Tim Williams, and video recorded comments by Kevin Clayton, these all line up to demonstrate how independent retailers, communities, and producers – among others – where purportedly harmed by action that could be deemed an antitrust violation. Why hasn’t Allen told his readers how that cost them money? https://www.manufacturedhomelivingnews.com/bridging-gap-affordable-housing-solution-yields-higher-pay-more-wealth-but-corrupt-rigged-billionaires-moat-is-barrier/

 

That in turn also arguably kept lending from flowing back into the manufactured housing space.

 

DTS Manufactured Home Lending Committee Member Says MHI in “Unholy Alliance” to Divert Needed GSE Support Away from Manufactured Housing

 

The aftermath and outcomes were many. These incidents contributed to the tidal shift that hit not only manufactured home retailers, but also communities, occupancy, and thus their values were impaired too.

 

Manufactured Home Community Case Study, UMH Properties, Lessons for Independent Community Owners, Investors

 

There is also an element of self-fulfilling prophecy in this matter. A lack of lending naturally harms resale values of manufactured homes, much like it did with conventional housing during the housing/mortgage crisis.

Furthermore, as was reported last year, it was the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) that said that manufactured homes demonstrably appreciated in value. Given the various ways that lending to manufactured homes have purportedly been artificially limited, that factoid is a pleasant surprise.

It should be noted that virtually all of what Weiss has recounted occurred prior to the Mark Calabria becoming Director of the FHFA.

 

MHARRMarkWeissIfCongressHadMeanttheDutytoServeToBeOptionItWouldNotHaveCalledItADutyDefintionofDutyIsMandatoryResponsibilityDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

 

In a previous comment to MHProNews, Weiss made the previous statements above and below about Duty to Serve (DTS).

 

MarkWeissDTSQuoteManufacturedHousingAssocRegulatoryReformMHARRDailyBusinessNewsMHproNews

Additional points that bears mention is that the GSEs have been sponsoring MHI events. How is that not a conflict of interest?

 

2018-10-03_1018ManufacturedHousingInstituteHILogoCavcoFleetwoodPalmHarborFannieMaeFreddieMacLogoDailyBusinessNEwsMHProNEws

Marty Lavin advises, “Follow the Money” and “Pay More Attention to What People Do Than What They Say.” The GSEs are praising manufactured home quality, but then worked with Clayton Homes and MHI to create a so-called ‘new class’ of manufactured homes, per sources.

 

Furthermore, well prior the Calabria era beginning and before the new Congress being seated in 2019, Jeb Hensarling pointed to what he felt was improper lobbying by GSEs. One of several possible references to that is linked via the text-image box below.

 

Update on Fannie Mae Lobbying, and Manufactured Housing Controversy

 

 

Conclusions

There is a quilt-work of items that are causing the slowdown and underperformance of manufactured housing. Financing must rank high on that list, for the reasons noted herein.

But at the core of these concerns ought to be the common threads.

  • Clayton Homes, 21st Mortgage, Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, and Berkshire Hathaway have their finger prints on these matters.
  • Clayton and their related Berkshire lenders has been spotlighted by several Democratic lawmakers, including 2020 presidential hopefuls.

 

Senate Democrats – Including 2020 Presidential Contenders – Ask CFPB Protect Consumers Against Predatory Lenders — Point Finger at Clayton Homes, Berkshire Hathaway Lending

 

  • The Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) held closed door meetings with the GSEs, that none of the parties involved have released meeting minutes on.  They should be part of any Congressional or other investigation.
  • The Seattle Times, and Clayton’s hometown local news media – besides MHProNews – has reported on numerous federal investigations relative to Clayton that purported involve MHI connections.

 

 

 

One of the posted comments on the video above, from ‘Tobz4uhuni ItsMyName’ posted this, with typos in the original:

Clayton aka Vanderbilt is a horrible place. I have been in mine since 07. They placed it on the wrong land and it sets off by 3 acres. They know they did this and refuses to move it and correct the problem. They also have been offered a deed to the piece of land where it sits providing they quit claim the other piece of land that sits 3 acrea off and they refuse to move. Yet these unethical people, predators, illegal subhumans expect for me to pay for this mobile home when it isnt attached to the acre its suppose to. It sits on someone elses land and he will be moving it soon bc he is building a home where the mobile home sits. Clayton can make it right, but refuses. Plus they sell someone whose credit scores are 500 and 525 mobile homes with a price tag of 63k, an interest rate of 10.5% and make only 9 dollars an hr. Make complaints with your attorney generals office, the state of Tennessees attorneys office and the consumer protection bureaus office. These people need to be stopped.”

These may well rise to the level that merit Congressional investigation, but also Department of Justice (DoJ) investigation.  In a recent statement, DoJ’s top antirust person made statements that if applied to Clayton et al could be seen as a warning sign. See the link here, and the related reports, further below.

RememberThisQuoteIrPrettyPicturesMHIndustryWillOnlyAchieveItsGoalsByResovingItsCoreIssuesLATonyKovachMHProNews

That’s today’s second episode of News Through the Lens of Manufactured Homes, and Factory-Built Housing,” © where “We Provide, You Decide.” © ## (News, analysis, and commentary.)

 

ManufacturedHousingProNewsMHProNewsConfidentialTipsDocumentsNews

To report a news tip, click the image above or send an email to iReportMHNewsTips@mhmsm.com – To help us spot your message in our volume of email, please put the words NEWS TIP or Comments or Letter to Editor in the subject line.

NOTICE: You can get our ‘read-hot’ industry-leading emailed headline news updates, at this link here. You can join the scores who follow us on Twitter at this link. Connect on LinkedIn here.

NOTICE 2: Readers have periodically reported that they are getting a better experience when reading MHProNews on the Microsoft Edge, or Apple Safari browser than with Google’s Chrome browser. Chrome reportedly manipulates the content of a page more than the other two browsers do.

(Related Reports are further below. Third-party images and content are provided under fair use guidelines.)

1) To sign up in seconds for our MH Industry leading emailed news updates, click here.

ManufacturedHomeIndustry#1HeadlineNewsMHProNews

To see a sample of our emailed news update, click here. To sign up for the factory-built home industry’s #1 headline news, click here or the graphic above.

2) To pro-vide a News Tips and/or Commentary, click the link to the left. Please note if comments are on-or-off the record, thank you.

3) Marketing, Web, Video, Consulting, Recruiting and Training Re-sources

SoheylaKovachDailyBusinessNewsMHProNewsMHLivingNewsSubmitted by Soheyla Kovach to the Daily Business News for MHProNews.com. Soheyla is a managing member of LifeStyle Factory Homes, LLC, the parent company to MHProNews, and MHLivingNews.com.

Related Reports:

You can click on the image/text boxes to learn more about that topic.

Shocking, True State of the Manufactured Housing Industry, plus Solutions for Profitable, Sustainable Growth – May 2019

Secretary Ben Carson’s, Julian Castro’s Manufactured Housing, “Trailer,” “Mobile Home” Revelations, 2020 Battles Ahead

 

 

 

 

 

Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger Video Interview at Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting on GSEs Lending for Affordable Manufactured Housing and Clayton Homes

May 6th, 2019 Comments off

 

WarrenBuffettCharlieMungerVideoInterviewBerkshireHathawayAnnualMeetingGSELendingAffordableHousingClaytonHomes

For those that are new or want a refresher, the exclusive report by the Daily Business News on MHProNews of the Clayton Homes related 2018 data from Warren Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway is found at the report linked from the text-image box below.

 

 

2018 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Report, Clayton Homes, Shaw Data Revealed, Facts Others Lack

 

This weekend has witnessed the so-called “Woodstock of Capitalism,” the 2019 edition of the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholders meeting in Omaha, NE. An estimated 40,000 plus were expected to attend.

Yahoo provided coverage of the event, and the video below is from that source.  Per Yahoo, “Buffett said it would be “very good for America” if Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac did more to help finance manufactured homes, such as those made by Berkshire-owned Clayton Homes.”

 

 

There is a lot to unpack from this 4 minutes, 2 second long video.

As close, thoughtful, and longtime readers of our pro-industry trade media platforms already know, there have been allegations for years of market manipulation by Clayton Homes within the manufactured housing industry and finance space.  One such report, based upon a letter from Tim Williams at 21st Mortgage Corp, the words of Buffett himself from that same year, and a nearly 1-hour long video with Kevin Clayton, are all found at the link above.

What is discerned from this weekend’s statement by Buffett and Munger ought to be viewed through that lens, and what follows.

Furthermore, there are sources inside the GSEs, and from a Berkshire brand led by CEO Tim Williams at 21st that indicated that for some time, the powers-that-be from Omaha-Knoxville metros worked first to foil, and more recently, to redirect lending from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac away from the bulk of manufactured housing.

 

For such reasons, the Manufactured Housing Association for Regulatory Reform (MHARR) has been engaged in a tough, protracted battle to encourage the full implementation of the law, not just a partial one.

 

MarkWeissDTSQuoteManufacturedHousingAssocRegulatoryReformMHARRDailyBusinessNewsMHproNews

MHARR Calls on New Fannie Mae CEO Hugh Frater to Fully and Properly Implement Federal Law

With all due respect to Buffet, as the next link reveals, there have been times that what he said did not line up.

More recently, HBO’s Last Night Tonight with John Oliver viral video errantly dubbed “Mobile Homes” reflected the revelation that it was Buffett’s brands and Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) connected companies that were causing the industry blowback in mainstream media reports.  Our publisher in a letter published in 5 markets in Florida, including Jacksonville called on the public to hold those responsible for purported misdeeds, not the industry at large.

Warren Buffett must be construed in the light of not only his words, but also of the deed of the brands they own.  Furthermore, as Buffett and Berkshire has been wont to fund both sides of certain battles, that raises fresh concerns, as the report linked here documents.

Those points and the linked evidence and logic from those articles should be kept in mind by investors, advocates, researchers, policy wonks, politicos  — plus, of course, the industry’s home owners and professionals.

That said, will Buffett’s comments this past weekend could potentially be used to encourage Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to lend on all manufactured homes, or just on select ones, as the Clayton-MHI backed ‘new class of homes’ effort promotes? Time will tell.  But as with all things connected to Buffett, it bears a nuanced consideration. See the related reports, further below.

That’s this post-dawn Monday morning episode of professional life in MHVille, exclusively from the #1 most-read “Industry News, Tips, and Views Pros Can Use,” © where “We Provide, You Decide.” © ## (News, analysis, and commentary.)

 

ManufacturedHousingProNewsMHProNewsConfidentialTipsDocumentsNews

To report a news tip, click the image above or send an email to iReportMHNewsTips@mhmsm.com – To help us spot your message in our volume of email, please put the words NEWS TIP in the subject line.

NOTICE: You can get our ‘read-hot’ industry-leading emailed headline news updates, at this link here. You can join the scores who follow us on Twitter at this link. Connect on LinkedIn here.

NOTICE 2: Readers have periodically reported that they are getting a better experience when reading MHProNews on the Microsoft Edge, or Apple Safari browser than with Google’s Chrome browser. Chrome reportedly manipulates the content of a page more than the other two browsers do.

(Related Reports are further below. Third-party images and content are provided under fair use guidelines.)

1) To sign up in seconds for our MH Industry leading emailed news updates, click here.

ManufacturedHomeIndustry#1HeadlineNewsMHProNews

To see a sample of our emailed news update, click here. To sign up for the factory-built home industry’s #1 headline news, click here or the graphic above.

2) To pro-vide a News Tips and/or Commentary, click the link to the left. Please note if comments are on-or-off the record, thank you.

3) Marketing, Web, Video, Consulting, Recruiting and Training Re-sources

SoheylaKovachDailyBusinessNewsMHProNewsMHLivingNewsSubmitted by Soheyla Kovach to the Daily Business News for MHProNews.com. Soheyla is a managing member of LifeStyle Factory Homes, LLC, the parent company to MHProNews, and MHLivingNews.com.

Related Reports:

You can click on the image/text boxes to learn more about that topic.

 

Warren Buffett’s Profitable Lessons for Manufactured Housing

“Mobile Home Militia,” Retail/Production Sources, Sound Alarm Against Clayton Homes, CMH, New “Anti-Competitive Practices” Allegation

News Tip, Document – Is Clayton Homes Engaged in False Down Payments? Deceptive Trade Practices?

CFPB and 21st, Second Shoe Drops? Flooring w/21st Mortgage Corp? Insider Tips

Tim Williams, PBS News’ Bad Bargain, Manufactured Housing Institute, Buffett’s Mirror, and Clayton’s Costume

Manufactured Housing Institute’s Monthly Economic Report Spotlights Challenge, What MHI, WHA’s Amy Bliss Said

White Collar Shakedown, Fear, Hobbs Act, and Manufactured Housing Independents Struggles

 

 

“Lead, Follow … Or Get Out of The Way”

 

MHARR Calls on New Fannie Mae CEO Hugh Frater to Fully and Properly Implement Federal Law

“The Illusion of Motion Versus Real-World Challenges”

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fannie Mae Reports Billions in Manufactured Home Community Deals, Details Others Lack

January 25th, 2019 Comments off

 

FannieMaeReportsBillionsManufacturedHomeCommunityDealsDetailsOthersLackDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

In a release to the Daily Business News on MHProNews, Fannie Mae (OTCQB: FNMA) said that they have “provided more than $65 billion in financing to support the multifamily market in 2018 with its Delegated Underwriting and Servicing (DUS®) program. Fannie Mae continued to serve as a key source of liquidity by attracting a diverse investor base to purchase our DUS Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS), while building a profitable and sustainable book of business.”

 

For more than 30 years, the DUS platform has brought stability to the multifamily market. Our innovative thinking is driving the industry forward and our commitment to serving our customers remains our top priority,” said Jeffery Hayward, Executive Vice President of Multifamily, Fannie Mae. “Our lender partnerships are also propelling Fannie Mae to be part of a global movement to transform rental housing to be healthier for residents and to help reduce energy and water consumption at the properties we finance.”

The Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSE) of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have both been given some latitude by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA)) for using certain qualifying loans on manufactured home communities as credits toward their Duty to Serve (DTS) requirements. Right or wrong, that use of DTS has been far more robust than it has toward single family manufactured home loans.

Fannie Mae was recognized in 2018 as the largest issuer of Green Bonds in the world, with more than $20 billion in Green MBS backed by either green certified properties or properties targeting a reduction in energy or water consumption. Fannie Mae increased its Green Financing portfolio to over $50 billion in 2018, driven by $20 billion in Green Financing. In 2018, Fannie Mae made LIHTC equity investment commitments towards meeting FHFA’s $500 million volume cap by deploying equity to rural and other underserved housing markets throughout the United States. Additionally, Fannie Mae led the affordable market with overall production of $7.4 billion, an increase of 9% from 2017,” stated their release to MHProNews.

Multifamily had another outstanding year in 2018, thanks to our lenders,” said Rob Levin, Senior Vice President for Multifamily Customer Engagement, Fannie Mae. “Together, we supported all market segments, bringing liquidity to the market, while building a balanced portfolio that reflects our strategy with strong credit quality and mission-rich business.”

The following list are the top 10 DUS Lenders produced the highest business volumes in 2018. Also listing that follows also includes the Top 5 Lender rankings for highest volumes in 2018 for Multifamily Affordable Housing, Small Loans, Green Financing, Seniors Housing, Structured Transactions, Manufactured Housing Communities, and Student Housing:

 

Top 10 DUS Producers in 2018             Volume ($Billion)

  1. Wells Fargo Multifamily Capital                      $8.1
  2. Walker & Dunlop, LLC                                    $6.9
  3. Berkadia Commercial Mortgage, LLC             $6.6
  4. CBRE Multifamily Capital, Inc.                        $6.1
  5. Newmark Knight Frank                                    $4.3
  6. Greystone Servicing Corporation, Inc.            $3.9
  7. Capital One, National Association                   $3.8
  8. KeyBank National Association                         $3.4
  9. PGIM Real Estate Finance                              $3.3
  10. Arbor Commercial Funding I, LLC                   $3.2

 

Top 5 DUS Producers for Multifamily Affordable Housing in 2018

  1. Wells Fargo Multifamily Capital
  2. CBRE Multifamily Capital, Inc.
  3. Greystone Servicing Corporation, Inc.
  4. PGIM Real Estate Finance
  5. Jones Lang LaSalle Multifamily, LLC

 

Top 5 DUS Producers for Small Loans in 2018*

  1. Greystone Servicing Corporation, Inc.
  2. Arbor Commercial Funding I, LLC
  3. Hunt Mortgage Group
  4. Walker & Dunlop, LLC
  5. Bellwether Enterprise Real Estate Capital, LLC

 

Top 5 DUS Producers for Green Financing in 2018

  1. Berkadia Commercial Mortgage, LLC
  2. Greystone Servicing Corporation, Inc.
  3. Arbor Commercial Funding I, LLC
  4. CBRE Multifamily Capital, Inc.
  5. Capital One, National Association

 

Top 5 DUS Producers for Seniors Housing in 2018

  1. Berkadia Commercial Mortgage, LLC
  2. Grandbridge Real Estate Capital, LLC
  3. Capital One, National Association
  4. CBRE Multifamily Capital, Inc.
  5. M&T Realty Capital Corporation

 

Top 5 DUS Producers for Structured Transactions in 2018

  1. Wells Fargo Multifamily Capital
  2. Newmark Knight Frank
  3. Walker & Dunlop, LLC
  4. PNC Real Estate
  5. Berkadia Commercial Mortgage, LLC

 

Top 5 DUS Producers for Manufactured Housing Communities in 2018

  1. Walker & Dunlop, LLC
  2. Wells Fargo Multifamily Capital
  3. KeyBank National Association
  4. Berkadia Commercial Mortgage, LLC
  5. Capital One, National Association

 

Top 5 DUS Producers for Student Housing in 2018

  1. Wells Fargo Multifamily Capital
  2. Walker & Dunlop, LLC
  3. CBRE Multifamily Capital, Inc.
  4. PGIM Real Estate Finance
  5. KeyBank National Association

 

Listed below are 2018 production highlights for individual business categories, which are included in the total multifamily production number.

  • Affordable Housing – $7.4 billion comprised of $6.0 billion in Multifamily Affordable Housing (for rent-restricted properties and properties receiving other federal and state subsidies), an increase of 10 percent from $5.4 billion in 2017; and $1.4 billion for properties with rent restrictions between 60 percent and 80 percent AMI, in line with $1.4 billion in 2017
  • Small Loans* – $2.2 billion
  • Green Financing – $20.1 billion (properties with Green Building Certifications or loans targeting a 25 percent reduction or more in energy or water consumption)
  • Student Housing – $2.7 billion
  • Structured Transactions – $9.5 billion
  • Seniors Housing – $2.3 billion
  • Manufactured Housing Communities – $2.9 billion, an increase of 56 percent from $1.9 billion in 2017

Footnotes:

*Small Loans are defined as loans of $3 million or less nationwide and $5 million or less in high-cost markets, and typically finance multifamily properties with five to 50 units.

**Due to rounding, amounts reported may not add up to overall totals.

The above is insightful on several levels.  First, note that more than one of those manufactured home community DUS lenders has ties to Berkshire Hathaway.

Next, is that this is arguably part of the give-take mechanism that Arlington, VA based Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) has used to get some of their community members in the National Community Council (NCC) to swallow and ignore the single-family chattel lending that the Manufactured Housing Association for Regulatory Reform (MHARR) has stressed should be at the core of DTS by the GSEs.

 

MHARRMarkWeissIfCongressHadMeanttheDutytoServeToBeOptionItWouldNotHaveCalledItADutyDefintionofDutyIsMandatoryResponsibilityDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

 

It also brings back into focus what some in manufactured housing call the “sell-out” or “betrayal” of the industry’s independent producers of manufactured homes. How so?  Consider this from Fannie Mae’s own site, which stresses their ‘support’ for manufactured housing as:

  1. A) The Multifamily Manufactured Housing Communities Market . …
  2. B) Develop an enhanced manufactured housing loanproduct for quality manufactured (homes)…

It must not be forgotten that MHI leaders held closed door meetings with Fannie and Freddie, to which none of the parties have released the meeting minutes, that ultimately resulted in the “new class of homes” program that has emerged…

…and so far has landed with a thud.  While Fannie and Freddie are both mum on specifics, the new HUD Code manufactured home shipments data is all the proof that is needed.  That data, combined with anecdotal information from various sources have made it clear that little has occurred from the new class of homes, other than noise from MHI, their allies, and Omaha-Knoxville puppet masters.

YouAskTheQuestionsRecordWithSmarthonePublicStatementsUsefulForExposingCorruptoinCollusioniNsideManufacturedHousingDailyBusinessNewsMHproNews

To report a news tip, click the image above or send an email to iReportMHNewsTips@mhmsm.com – To help us spot your message in our volume of email, please put the words NEWS TIP in the subject line.

For more, see the related reports, linked below. That’s MH “Industry News, Tips, and Views Pros Can Use” © where “We Provide, You Decide.” ## © (News, analysis, and commentary.)

 

ManufacturedHousingProNewsMHProNewsConfidentialTipsDocumentsNews

To report a news tip, click the image above or send an email to iReportMHNewsTips@mhmsm.com – To help us spot your message in our volume of email, please put the words NEWS TIP in the subject line.

NOTICE: You can get our ‘read-hot’ industry-leading emailed headline news updates, at this link here. You can join the scores who follow us on Twitter at this link. Connect on LinkedIn here.

NOTICE 2: Readers have periodically reported that they are getting a better experience when reading MHProNews on the Microsoft Edge, or Apple Safari browser than with Google’s Chrome browser. Chrome reportedly manipulates the content of a page more than the other two.

(Related Reports are further below. Third-party images and content are provided under fair use guidelines.)

1) To sign up in seconds for our MH Industry leading emailed news updates, click here.

ManufacturedHomeIndustry#1HeadlineNewsMHProNews

To see a sample of our emailed news update, click here. To sign up for the factory-built home industry’s #1 headline news, click here or the graphic above.

2) To pro-vide a News Tips and/or Commentary, click the link to the left. Please note if comments are on-or-off the record, thank you.

3) Marketing, Web, Video, Consulting, Recruiting and Training Re-sources

SoheylaKovachDailyBusinessNewsMHProNewsMHLivingNewsSubmitted by Soheyla Kovach to the Daily Business News for MHProNews.com. Soheyla is a managing member of LifeStyle Factory Homes, LLC, the parent company to MHProNews, and MHLivingNews.com.

 

Related Reports:

You can click on the image/text boxes to learn more about that topic.

MHI CEO Dick Jennison’s Pledge – 500,000 New Manufactured Home Shipments

GSEs’ “Duty To Serve Underserved Markets” Plans

Midwest Manufactured Housing Federation Official Louisville Show Communique to MHProNews

 

Independent National Manufactured Housing Post-Production Association Takes Major Step

Production Decline Continues in November 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

“What Are We, Chopped Liver?” MHI Member December 2018 Reactions

December 11th, 2018 Comments off

 ClaytonHomes21stVanderbiltManufacuturedHousingInstituteFannieMaeLogoChoppedLiver

 

It should be a given that the upper management of Clayton Homes, and their Arlington, VA based Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) are in favor of their stated agendas.

 

 

ManufacturedHousingInstituteMHINewClassofHomesDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

Still from MHI Video, logos added by MHProNews.

 

No sooner than MHI released their self-promotion video, than the industry’s new home shipments data – those nettlesome facts below – indicated that for all of MHI’s claims of millions of readers, their own emailed statement yesterday reflects the opposite results of what they’ve claimed.

Here are the claims, and the evidence, according to MHI.

 ManufacturedHousingInstitutelogoMHILogoMHIVideoStillsMillionsofViewsDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

 

Here below is a screen capture of MHI/National Community Council (NCC) Vice President Jenny Hodge’s email on the latest data, per MHI.

 ManufacturedHousingInstituteMHILogoOctober2018HUDCodeHomeShipmentsDeclineDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

What MHI’s own data and claims logically prove is that for all their bluster, new HUD Code manufactured shipments measured by the seasonally adjusted shipment rate (SAAR) – as of the above – are flat for 2018.  Even if the manufactured home industry finishes strong in the final quarter, what actual good has MHI’s promotions done so far?  

But there’s more sobering words from MHI members.

 

“What are We, Chopped Liver?”

An MHI member producer, in a long phone call to MHProNews, argued that the so-called MHI led “new class of homes” makes no sense, because it would have been easier to have simply built state-coded modular homes.

Another MHI producer said that “KEVIN CLAYTON” supported this “new class of homes” plan – which in that professional’s view – harms the interests of the majority of current manufactured housing plants. 

That source said, What are we [meaning the balance and majority of HUD Code manufactured housing production], chopped liver? 

 

The Genesis…

Here’s how a MHI-only member producer explained it in a message to the Daily Business News on MHProNews.

Three years ago I took a group from Fannie Mae through a plant to tour to show what we were building… they were blow away… made you feel they don’t get out much to see what we are building… Surely, good would come from this to obtain better financing on our homes for all [of the manufactured home] industry,” said the message to MHProNews’ tip line.

Fast forward to the roll out of the new class of homes financing…This a slap in the face,” said that production veteran, adding “…what are we chopped liver! Our HUD code is not good enough?

Why [a] 5:12 pitched roof? Many, many factories today will not build that when they have back logs of 3 to 6 months.” He added a laundry list of specs between standard HUD Code production, and the specs that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac want to see in this Clayton/MHI led “new class of homes,” including, “100% drywall… Why? You cannot see that from the street… let the consumer chose that.”

A number of professionals said that this plan was not only developed by Clayton, it obviously could benefit their new conventional housing subdivisions, which that from has been purchasing in recent years.

Warren Buffett has said that they expect to buy more site building opportunities.

Fannie Mae, Clayton, and MHI – to name but three key organizational players – are attempting to move the industry in a direction that arguably contradicts Kevin Clayton’s own statement from a few years ago.  Some may recall Clayton saying that the industry should not to forget those “that brought you to the dance.”

 

WarrenBuffettKevinClaytonClaytonTinyHouseBerkshireAnnualMeetingDailyBUsinessNewsMHProNews

 

But that new class plan is arguably just what the new GSE connected lending does. It ignores the majority of the industry’s products and consumers in favor of a minority. 

Furthermore, the industry’s HUD Code producers have long been able to build entry-level or residential style products. MHLivingNews articles and videos have made that consumer choice option apparent.

As more than one HUD Code builder proves, you can have residential style homes that are less expensive than these new class of homes will be, and they are proven to attract conventional new home buyers. 

manufacturedhomecollage-entrylevelcapecodmultisectionalsinglesectional-creditmanufacturedhomelivingnewsmhlivingnews

There are markets for each of these styles of homes, and consumers ought to have the ability to chose that home based upon their budget, circumstances, and desires. Builders should be allowed to build whatever the want to as well. That said, what this new class of homes does is bend the system in an artificial way, based upon financing that the GSEs were required to provided under HERA 2008 mandated Duty to Serve to Manufactured Housing. Its an apparent manipulation of the system, and sources say that even if this plan is successful, it will harm many for the benefit of a few. But what if this plan is no more successful than Clayton’s iHouse or iHouse 2.0?  Then, not only time and expense are lost, but the reputation of the industry is harmed too.

For example, award-winning retailer Stan Dye said that half of his sales are to people that previously owned a conventional house.  Isn’t that good enough for Clayton, the GSEs, and MHI?

 

 

Logically, given that

      FHFA,

      the National Association of Realtors,

      HUD’s PD&R

      plus other research shows that the millions of current manufactured homes can and do appreciate,

      where is the logic for creating these new and unproven standards?

 

Consider the Track Record… 

Consider the track record Clayton Homes has in such “innovative” product roll-outs. Our sources at Clayton remind readers that the Clayton’s iHouse and the iHouse 2.0 – which were both rolled out with great fanfare, and got significant media attention – both flopped.

Oops.

 

ihouse Clayton Green-Bridge-Farm-i-House-Chevy-Volt-568x378

Ever wonder whatever happened to the Clayton’s iHouse? Not much, so it was quietly dropped, per sources at Clayton. Will this new class of homes be next?  More to the point, will this Clayton-MHI “new class of homes’ harm the value of the current HUD Code manufactured homes in the process?  Photo Green Bridge Farm, the Clayton iHouse is shown with a Chevy Volt, which is also being cancelled by GM. Oops.

 

Thus far, the GSEs are leaving the vast majority of producers and all other HUD Code manufactured homes essentially out. The indications are that this plan purportedly came from Clayton and is obviously being promoted MHI. Why didn’t they back chattel and other lending for millions of proven HUD code standards homes instead? 

Isn’t backing all HUD Code manufactured homes what the Duty to Serve Manufactured Housing part of the law clearly implied? Where in the Housing and Economic Recovery Act (HERA) of 2008 – which gave us the Duty to Serve (DTS) did it say that the GSEs should compel manufactured housing to create entirely different homes before they get lending?

It’s an outrage, which is why that MHI builder said it is “a slap in face.”

 

 

It Gets Worse

This plan, which MHProNews said last year could be a Trojan Horse, is sadly developing in just that fashion. Because sources say that this plan arguably undermines the acceptance – and thus the value – of millions of existing HUD Code homes.

Who says? A parter and association member in a community operation. He’s not alone.

Beyond complaints about the new class and related GSE lending, one source said that when you factor in the additional costs of building to this new class or homes standards that Clayton-MHI are leading, the consumers who buy them are not going to save money, or get lower payments, even with the GSEs lower interest rate.

Recall that in San Antonio last year, in a room with a few dozen MHI members, Tim Williams of 21st said that the Berkshire Hathaway lender’s wants to make sure that the GSEs don’t take only their top tier credit “traunch.”

Well, it seems that this plan currently avoids taking any loans away from 21st or Vanderbilt. So Tim Williams, former MHI Chairman and still 21st President and CEO, will get his wish.

Put differently, this plan if it fails or succeeds, purportedly harms the bulk of would be and existing consumers. It does so to the benefit one major conglomerate that also does site building. The plan is finding quiet resistance on several fronts from MHI’s own members. 

 InfographicMobileManufacturedHomeManufacturedHousingIndustryFactsDataResearchMobileManufacturedHomeLivingNews

 

But the voices are muted because of the Smoking Gun track record.   You can learn more about that by clicking the linked box, below, for that report.

 

Smoking Gun 3 – Warren Buffett, Kevin Clayton, Clayton Homes, 21st Mortgage Corp Tim Williams – Manufactured Home Lending, Sales Grab?

 

These are some of the explosive comments signaled last week, in the prior report that is linked from the box below.

 

Explosive Comments on Duty to Serve Manufactured Housing Lending from Well Placed Sources

 

Clever Moat Building?

This new class of homes is arguably clever as a tool to eliminate over time more of Berkshire’s competition. By causing some industry firms to invest in a product, it will tend to get those producers ‘dug in’ to continue the plan. They may be following a lead whose Clayton iHouse and iHouse 2.0 both failed. 

But in the meantime, how many thousands of consumers who wanted to refinance 21st Mortgage Corp or Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance loans – Berkshire Hathaway brands – at a lower interest rate will be left out in the cold? Millions of their HUD Code homes don’t qualify for a program that Congress mandated?  How is that possible, or even sufficient to meet the legal mandates?

Rephrased, this is de facto a head shot against the interests of:

     millions of existing manufactured home homeowners,

     aims at any plants and companies that don’t participate in the plan,

     bending Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to the will of Berkshire Hathaway, and it was accomplished in closed door meetings that the GSEs, and MHI won’t release the minutes to.

The standards arguably fail in the essence of the Duty to Serve, namely, to provide more lower cost financing for millions of renters.

The American Dream, Arguably Among the Most Profitable, But Least Understood Stories in the USA Today

 

Let the Consumer Choose

The Daily Business News on MHProNews last Saturday said that #HousingChoice should be part of the mantra of the industry’s independents. 

#HousingChoice

Housing Choice, Where Modular, Manufactured, Tiny, Conventional Housing Crisis, MHI and MHARR Intersect

 

Consumers need to be educated to accept what millions have already benefited from. What’s good for consumers is also a strong market for investors, lenders, sellers, communities, suppliers, and others.

Mark Weiss, JD, President and CEO of the Manufactured Housing Association for Regulatory Reform (MHARR) said months ago that the Duty to Serve was a mandate.

 MHARRMarkWeissIfCongressHadMeanttheDutytoServeToBeOptionItWouldNotHaveCalledItADutyDefintionofDutyIsMandatoryResponsibilityDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

 

Weiss also argued that this roll out of the GSE program was set to benefit only a few companies.

 

ManufacturedHousingAssocRegulatoryReformMHARRMarkWeissDTSFHFA-GSEsGoingtoLargestBusinessesCorpAffiliatesDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

Collage by MHProNews.

 

It’s not MHI’s VP Jenny Hodge’s fault if new manufactured home shipments are declining. MHI’s president is said to “turn red” when embarrassed or upset. So, how “red” does Richard ‘Dick’ Jennison glow today, after he’s done reading this analysis? 

How red with anger will resident groups become once they figure out that Berkshire Hathaway and MHI – which they arguably dominate – plus the GSEs have ignored them in favor of more expensive housing?

How mad will community owners be if they map out the trend lines, and realize that this plan shafts them too?

Clayton, MHI, and the GSEs won’t formally respond to such concerns. But MHProNews has had tips from ‘inside’ this program, on the GSEs side of the fence.

 

ManufacturedHousingProNewsMHProNewsConfidentialTipsDocumentsNews

To report a news tip, click the image above or send an email to iReportMHNewsTips@mhmsm.com – To help us spot your message in our volume of email, please put the words NEWS TIP in the subject line.

 

As one of those sources experienced in financing told MHProNews, the way this program was developed was “completely backwards.” Instead of listening to the industry, and finding ways to meet the needs, the GSEs dictated standards that were set only for this new class of homes. 

The evidence and the comments from an array of sources suggest that this is no accident. It was an arranged plan. It was rigged from the GSE side, and from the producers side. This plan was unveiled in Las Vegas, we are told that many walked out of the presentation in disgust or protest.

Manufactured Housing Institute “Walk Out,” “Cover Up,” and Shock at their Vegas Event

 

It’s as that MHI producer said, a slap in the face of the industry. And MHI now wants members to open up their checkbooks and renew their association membership for a plan their biggest member logically engineered, aimed at harming their own interests.

 

 

SoTheAssociationMHIIsNotThereFortheIndustryUnlesstheinterestsoftheBigBoysJointheIndustry'sMartyLavinMHIAwardWinnerQuoteMHProNews

MHProNews looks at the facts, considers the sources, and follows the evidence. MHI earlier last year, and for years before, MHI routinely replied promptly to all inquiries. But since we’ve spotlighted the problems and concerns, they’ve gone silent. Why? If the facts are on their side, why not make offer a cogent explanation?

 

It was on a different topic that Marty Lavin said it, but doesn’t it apply here?  As an MHI Producer said, “This program clearly was not “duty to serve.

Based upon the evidence and the track record, MHProNews advises the industry’s members to explore their options with MHARR, MHIdea and NMHCO. More on this in the links below and the days ahead.We Provide, You Decide.” © ## (News, analysis, and commentary.)

NOTICE: Readers have periodically reported that they are getting a better experience when reading MHProNews on the Microsoft Edge, or Apple Safari browser than with Google’s Chrome browser. Chrome reportedly manipulates the content of a page more than the other two browsers.

(Related Reports are further below. Third-party images and content are provided under fair use guidelines.)

1) To sign up in seconds for our MH Industry leading emailed news updates, click here.

ManufacturedHomeIndustry#1HeadlineNewsMHProNews

To see a sample of our emailed news update, click here. To sign up for the factory-built home industry’s #1 headline news, click here or the graphic above.

2) To provide a News Tips and/or Commentary, click the link to the left. Please note if your comments are on-or-off the record, thank you.

3) Marketing, Web, Video, Consulting, Recruiting and Training Re-sources

SoheylaKovachDailyBusinessNewsMHProNewsMHLivingNewsSubmitted by Soheyla Kovach to the Daily Business News for MHProNews.com. Soheyla is a managing member of LifeStyle Factory Homes, LLC, the parent company to MHProNews, and MHLivingNews.com.

Related Reports: Click the Boxes Below to Read More...

“It’s a Terrible Idea,” Comments from Manufactured Home Community Owners, Senior Management, and Investors

Whistleblower! Ex-Clayton Homes Team Member on TV Denounces Manufactured Housing Giant’s Practices

 

“Pants on Fire” – Latest New Manufactured Housing Shipment Report

#$2Trillion U.S. GDP Growth via Affordable Housing Plan Few Discuss – Introducing #YimbyVictory2020

 

Nathan & Mary Lee Chance Smith, Leaders in ‘Anti-Trump Resistance,’ Manufactured Housing Impact?

 

 

 

 

 

 

“It’s a Terrible Idea,” Comments from Manufactured Home Community Owners, Senior Management, and Investors

December 7th, 2018 Comments off


ItsTerribleIdeaCommentsFromManufacturedHomeCommunityOwnersSeniormanagementProducersInvestorsDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews
Skimmer alert: the subject isn’t a video per se.  But we open this Daily Business News on MHProNews with a comment about a new video because it shines a light on broader issues that have drawn comments – also shared below – from a variety of industry personalities.  Many are from the manufactured home community sector.  But other voices from retail and production have weighed in too, as you will see.

 

A company president with interests in communities that has also done retail wrote a long missive that began as follows. “My first reaction when I saw the opening frames [of the Manufactured Housing Institute self-promotional video] was WTF?????  OBVIOUS to me at least that this was made for folks who DON’T know the real details behind the [manufactured housing industry’s current condition] story.  In a depressed industry, with competition slowly being choked out of existence, they [MHI] come out like we’re back in 1999!  What a joke.”

 

Terrible Idea

It’s a terrible idea,” said another large community owner during a 75-minute phone call to MHProNews,to have communities lumped in” with producers, retail, and other industry segments at the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI). That pro said he hasn’t seen the MHI video, and said he could care less.

Why?

What has MHI done to alleviate any of the concerns” for communities, was the response.  Examples given by the caller included costly installations being mandated by HUD was part of that community owners comment.

He’s far from alone.

The Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs) of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and financing issues have sparked several responses from operations of varied sizes, from coast-to-coast.

MHI pays lip service to communities. Sure, they have their community focused events. But in terms of policies, what has MHI actually done? It’s still a retail and production-oriented organization.”

The dues paid by communities [to MHI] are not that bad,” said one. “But there’s no performance [by MHI] either. I’m waiting to see who will step up and do something that will be helpful for communities.”

MHI provides “a lot of sizzle, but the steak’s still kinda tough. We as an industry are still WAY below where all rationale says we should be, IF ONLY NORMAL MARKET FORCES WERE AT WORK HERE.  I have long felt that to NOT be the case, as you [MHProNews] are also verifying through your investigative reporting.”

Put differently, one of the hot-topics include a growing sense of manufactured home market manipulation and monopolistic practices.  There are many who believe that the industry should be performing far better, but that manipulation of the market has kept the industry at far below it’s capability.

 

 

A Wink and a Nod?

I have no doubt that deals are made [at MHI] with a wink and a nod” that benefits some operations at the expense of others stated a partner in a community operation.

Nathan Smith was a name that drew repeated fire. “What a likable guy, who sadly is working every ——ing day to get politicians elected who harm everything independent business people in our industry stand for and need [in order] to be successful.” Without saying so, it is likely a reaction to the report found by clicking on the hot-linked box below.

 

Nathan & Mary Lee Chance Smith, Leaders in ‘Anti-Trump Resistance,’ Manufactured Housing Impact?

 

I just want an organization that helps keep Big Brother off my back,” explained one, commenting about MHI. “We have modest working-class [MH] communities. There are no clubhouses. Having to put in high-cost pads only increases the costs to consumers. MHI’s promos only shows photos or video of freshly black topped streets, that have double wides1, garages, and swimming pools. Hey, that’s great for those few that actually do offer that, but that ignores the reality at over 80 percent of the properties in our industry. It’s like they [MHI] are embarrassed by the reality that millions are happy to have a home that they can call their own, even if it is modest, it’s theirs.”

 

1 – sic terminology error in the original.  More properly,
multi-sectional manufactured homes. Note to Industry
newcomers – percentages shared by reader comments
may or may not be precise, but can be understood
as broadly on point.

SICSicutJournalismDefintionSocietyProfessionalJournalismDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

One mentioned a comment by Kevin Clayton, on an occasion when he said that the industry should “…dance with those that brought them to the dance.” Meaning, the industry should not forget the entry level product.  “But this Clayton/MHI new class of homes absolutely ignores the ones that brought manufactured homes to the housing industry dance.  Not providing them with Fannie [Mae] and Freddie [Mac] lending is another case of leaders doing the opposite of what they’ve said. Their program does nothing for community owners, and all of our industry’s existing home owners. It’s outrageous.”

It’s why, one said, so many community people walked out last year from the MHI presentation at their Congress and Expo.  ICYMI, you can learn more about that by clicking on the box in the report linked below.

 

Manufactured Housing Institute “Walk Out,” “Cover Up,” and Shock at their Vegas Event

 

 

What’s Next?

There have been questions and comments about the new national manufactured home community organization.

MHProNews has spotlighted the emerging group, and without endorsing it, has noted that at least NMHCO has condemned MHI’s performance failures for communities, which is a hopeful sign that those organizing community owners not only understand the issues, but have plans to address them.

An industry veteran said the need for MHIdea and the new community organization could not be more pressing, saying in part that while most are figuring out how to do more or better business, “SOME in our industry focus on an entirely different goal every morning:  “What can I do today to make my competition go away?“”

One pro said that whatever MHI or Clayton say they want, automatically sparks skepticism.  She gave an example, citing the fact that MHVillage has launched MH Insider, which has praised Kevin Clayton and MHI makes.  That pro now questions not only that publication, but the parent operation too. “If someone is promoting those con artists,” that person alleged, “after the reports we’ve read [on MHProNews], they are either blind, naïve, or part of their con.”

SubmitNewsTipsManufacturedHomeProNewsMHProNewsLogoDailyBusinessNews

Submit confidential or on-the-record news tips, or comments at this linked email mailto:iReportMHNewsTips@mhmsm.com

Whistleblower! Ex-Clayton Homes Team Member on TV Denounces Manufactured Housing Giant’s Practices

 

Are Tech and Emerging Trends Threatening to Undermine MH Communities?

An interesting observation has been about the changes on the horizon in transportation. Out West, where Elon Musk and his Boring Company have been doing tests on the hyperloop, there’s a gnawing concern that in conjunction with other trends, that hyperloop could in time undermine community values in or near metro areas.

Some of us [in the community sector] have thought about or sell properties to big box stores or multifamily housing redevelopers. But as technology like hyperloop develops, it may become ever-more important to be resident satisfaction focused. While today, communities have great stability and lots of exit options, that may not always be the case. If so, that could be [a] good [development] for residents, and the industry, in the long run.

 

ElonMuskHyperloopBoringCompanyManufacturedHousingIndustryDailyBusinessNewsMHproNews

This may have been a reference to one of the reports on MHProNews on that topic, see one example, at this link here.

 

More people work from home than a decade ago,” observed another. “Their [a home owner’s] location doesn’t have to be near downtown, or even in a suburb. Where is there any drive [by MHI] to attract that [home buying] audience?

The fact that MHI used Nathan [Smith] to attack the new communities association in their so-called newsletter is [a] clear reason to believe that they know that there’s unrest among many NCC [National Community Council] members.”

Anyone who has gone to a few Congress and Expos knows that they have very low actual attendance at most of their breakout sessions,” said one. “They have a few keynotes [that get better attendance], but beyond those, most [community professionals] take off and talk business with others or are handling calls and messages.”

 

Regarding MHI/NCC meetings:

> Education could be better and more relevant, as often low attendance at actual sessions underscores.

> Lobbying on behalf of actual needs and concerns of communities is almost none-existent.

> Some argue that MHI is undermining communities, by favoring initiatives that tilt toward clients of what previously was known as Clayton Bank, 21st, Vanderbilt, or other Berkshire Hathaway brands operating in manufactured housing.

Some – as was indicated earlier – used choice, blunt words.

Nathan is a disgrace to our industry,” is one example. “How can he be in a leadership role? I wouldn’t be surprised if he helped that d-mned Richard Cordray in his Ohio campaign for governor [the comment came from several states away, Cordray was prior head to the Obama Administration CFPB]. Nathan’s whole schtick is like a carnival barker, an embarrassment to those of us who try to run an honest business.”

CarnivalBarkerWikipediaDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews
DefinitonShtickWikipediaDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

 

I wouldn’t mind supporting more than one association, if a new group actually wanted to do something real. Once they [a new organization] proved themselves, dropping out of MHI would be no problem.”

Other who aren’t in MHI – but may or may not be members of state associations – are hopeful too.

I’ve been told that the mixers and events [for MHI] exist for two main reasons. They want independents [retailers, communities] to come which raises money for MHI, but it also gives the portfolio operations a chance to —ing schmooze us into selling [to them]. That video you guys have of Nathan [Smith] laughing while he says he wants all the communities for himself says it all. You guys [MHProNews] need to use that Monopolistic Housing Institute logo more, because that’s like a meme that captures what they [MHI] are all about.”

 

 

 

Anger Over GSEs and Financing

 

While community owners like the rates and terms they get on refinancing a property with one of the GSEs, when the topic turns to lending on actual manufactured homes, they often get angry.

It’s worse than an insult to promote this Clayton [Homes] backed ‘new class of homes,” said one. “It undermines what the HUD Code stands for and has accomplished. MHI has essentially helped the GSEs avoid supporting 95% of what consumers want to buy, in favor of something that is totally unproven.”

A concerned producer and MHI member indicated that the lower rate offered by the GSEs on that new class of homes is cancelled out by the far higher cost of the product. That same producer soberly said that the majority of producers couldn’t build such a home the way they are configured.

Put differently, that professional was explaining why most of the 130 some plants producing homes in the U.S. are being undermined by this Clayton/MHI initiative, that they purportedly got the GSEs to buy into.

Another MHI only member producer stressed that modular homes already qualified for GSE lending. “This [new class of homes] was just unnecessary.”

There are clearly conflicting interests at MHI, and they always tilt toward what Berkshire Hathaway wants.”

The two most heard or read words?

Thank you,” with an example from one who added, “for giving voice to those of us who’ve been abused by a train of lies and broken promises.”

You [MHProNews] are smart to be mixing in those videos and reports that teach the basics of what made America great,” because “what the reality of what is happening to our country could cost everything we hold dear if we don’t change [the trajectory of] the culture.”

 

Articles on related topics are linked further below. NMHCO has promised a new, formal statement on their latest is in the works. MH Idea is also found further below. Quotes may or may not represent the views of MHProNews. That’s this afternoon’s “News through the lens of manufactured homes, and factory-built housing,” © where “We Provide, You Decide.” © ## (News, analysis, and commentary.)

NOTICE: Readers have periodically reported that they are getting a better experience when reading MHProNews on the Microsoft Edge, or Apple Safari browser than with Google’s Chrome browser. Chrome reportedly manipulates the content of a page more than the other two browsers.

(Related Reports are further below. Third-party images and content are provided under fair use guidelines.)

1) To sign up in seconds for our MH Industry leading emailed news updates, click here.

ManufacturedHomeIndustry#1HeadlineNewsMHProNews

To see a sample of our emailed news update, click here. To sign up for the factory-built home industry’s #1 headline news, click here or the graphic above.

2) To provide a News Tips and/or Commentary, click the link to the left. Please note if your comments are on-or-off the record, thank you.

3) Marketing, Web, Video, Consulting, Recruiting and Training Re-sources

SoheylaKovachDailyBusinessNewsMHProNewsMHLivingNewsSubmitted by Soheyla Kovach to the Daily Business News for MHProNews.com. Soheyla is a managing member of LifeStyle Factory Homes, LLC, the parent company to MHProNews, and MHLivingNews.com.

 

Related Reports: Click the Boxes Below to Read More…

Nathan Smith, SSK Communities, and Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) Slam New National Manufactured Home Communities Group in Written Statement

 

“Servants of Satan” vs. Servants of God – Ex-GreenTree, Conseco, Current & Past MHI Members Sound-Off on Clayton, MHI, POTUS Trump, Bush 41, More

Giving Thanks for Manufactured Housing Independents, Applauding “MHIdea!”

Crisis of Misinformation, Fact Checks, and Manufactured Housing

Clayton’s Miss, Kevin and Tim’s Manufactured Housing Kill Shot, More

Machiavellian “Godfather” – Sam Zell, Warren Buffett, Capital, Lending and Crossed Lines in Manufactured Housing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Housing Choice, Where Modular, Manufactured, Tiny, Conventional Housing Crisis, MHI and MHARR Intersect

December 1st, 2018 Comments off

 

ClaytonHomesLogoManufacturedHousingInstituteLogoAssocRegulatoryReformHousingChoiceWhereModularTinyConventionalHousingCrisisSolutionMeets

Photos from Clayton website, and the logos are the properties of their respective organizations, provided here under fair use guidelines for news media. Text graphics and collage by MHProNews.

It is one of the most controversial issues in the manufactured housing industry today.  Through their apparent power at the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI), Clayton Homes has backed the notion of a “new class of manufactured homes.”

 

It is a thorny issue, as there are various, divided views on the matter.

 

Certainly, every company has the right and ability to act according to its own perceived interests, within the norms of the law and ethical restraints.

  • If a production company so desires, it can build widget shaped homes and call it a new class of manufactured homes.
  • A firm or organization could say that all new homes should have bull-nosed exterior corners or inverted pyramid shaped roofs in order to get special financing from Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
  • Or one could use less esoteric notions, and opt instead for making gutters, downspouts, higher-pitched roofs, and garages available options.

But such details have arguably been incorrectly framed from the start.  Shouldn’t buyers of whatever kind of home they want that meets basic safety, energy, and durability standards be given equal choice for housing in the marketplace, and for financing too?

Rephrased, shouldn’t there be a simple mantra ofhousing choice applied?

The Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs) of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have a federal legal mandate since 2008 that they somehow managed to dodge for a decade. Now, instead of offering the lower-cost home-only lending that about 80 percent of manufactured home customers select, instead, they provided a program that is only useful for a new, untested, and special kind of HUD Code home?

  • That special kind of home is what Clayton said they wanted, why?
  • And why is that GSE lending pushing a program that is only for land-home loans, which leaves most land-lease communities and the bulk of the retail sales of manufactured homes out in the cold?
  • How do those forced-fits foster housing choice?

 

Housing Choice Should Become Part of the MH Industry’s Mantra

  • Shouldn’t those who want to buy an already federally regulated HUD Code manufactured home be allowed to choose that or any other kind of safe and durable housing they want and are able to purchase?
  • Shouldn’t all housing shoppers who can demonstrate the decades of proven durability of their housing choice be allowed to have the same kind of financing options that conventional housing buyers have been able to access for decades?
  • Shouldn’t home buyers have the right to buy an entry-level or residential-style HUD Code manufactured homes with parity of financing?
  • Isn’t parity of financing an important part of how potentially millions of more price- and payment-sensitive renters can afford to buy a home of their own?
  • So if the clear logic of all of the above are obvious, why did MHI, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac hold closed door meetings – refusing to release the minutes of said closed door meeting discussions – which resulted not in more chattel lending, but rather in loans geared only to this so-called, ‘new class of manufactured homes’ that are backed by Clayton?

 

Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing, a Novel Yet Proven Solution to the Affordable Housing Crisis That Will Create Opportunities, Based Upon Existing Laws

 

Isn’t this new class of homes – and their accompanying Fannie and Freddie lending – just another back-door or oblique way of blocking access to more low-cost lending? Isn’t that effort obviously being led by the Berkshire brands in manufactured housing?  Doesn’t it remind you of the blast-from-the-past, courtesy of 21st Mortgage Corp, that is shown in their letter below?

 

21stMortgageCorpTimWillamsJune112009LetterBerkshireHathawayWarrenBuffettClaytonHomesManufacturedHousingIndustryDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

Click the image above to download a larger sized version of this 21st Mortgage Corp Letter.

 

Isn’t this new class of homes merely a revised and open version of Smoking Gun 3, where 21st Mortgage cut off lending to thousands of operations that didn’t carry Clayton product?  See the linked report that follows immediately below, plus more related reports further below for added details.

 

Smoking Gun 3 – Warren Buffett, Kevin Clayton, Clayton Homes, 21st Mortgage Corp Tim Williams – Manufactured Home Lending, Sales Grab?

 

We Already Have Had State Coded Modular Homes for Decades, So, Why this ‘New Class’ of HUD Code Homes?

Several voices from various parts of the industry have noted that modular housing already – on paper – had access to the same land/home mortgage lending that conventional housing enjoys.

Indeed, FHA, VA, and USDA already give parity of lending to HUD Code manufactured homes, as well as modular housing, so long as a proper installation and other lending guidelines are met.

Many manufactured home producers already built both “HUDs” and state-coded modular homes.

But HUD Code manufactured homes have widely outsold modular home building for decades. MHI’s own periodic data reflects that point.

When the goal for thousands of land-lease manufactured home communities, hundreds of manufactured home retailing independents, and MHARR has long been to get the GSEs to fully support manufactured homes with personal property loans, where was the logic of MHI pushing ‘behind closed doors’ the use of GSE lending only [???] for this new class of homes?

Hold that thought.

Hold that notion closely, because what the stated goal of MHARR and MHI began with on Duty to Serve seemed on the surface to be the same thing.  That was the apparent intersection, on paper, that virtually everyone in MHVille said they wanted more lending from the GSEs.

But what MHI ended up doing was redirecting their energy to get GSE lending only for their so-called ‘new class of homes.’  Even the new MHI self-defense, self-promotion video makes that reality a key point, as the screen capture from their new video below reflects.

 

LeveragingMomentumCreationNewClassofManufacturedHomesManufacturedHousingInstituteMHILogoDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews600

Screen capture with commentary and MHI’s logo are a collage by MHProNews, which faithfully reflects their “We’re Using Our Momentum Leveraging the Creation of a New Class of Manufactured Homes.” First, what momentum? Second, why the need for a new class of homes? Manufactured housing builders have made residential style homes since at least the 1980s. Buyers could always option in or do on-site whatever they wanted and can afford. It’s therefor a head fake, an apparent ruse that seemingly limits GSE lending to only a tiny sliver of the market that could already be served by modular coded factory-built homes, or by existing residential style HUD Code manufactured homes. This new class of homes is a costly waste of time, save for the fact that it diverts lower-cost financing. Who benefits from that fact?  A monopolist, perhaps?

BloombergShipmentNewManufacturedHomesFactoryBuildRebuildDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

Third-party to the industry Bloomberg’s shipment data of HUD Code homes reflects that there is a modest recovery, but that the manufactured home industry is still about 75 percent below its 1998 high water mark hit during the last 30 years.

If you want to sell more manufactured homes, this new class of homes is utterly illogical on the surface.  Manufactured housing roared during the 1990s compared to today.  Some claim it was only a sugar-high, based only on bogus lending.  But that claim ignores the reality that those home buyers wanted a manufactured home in the first place. In the mid-to-late 1990s and early 2000s, numerous researchers believed that the EXISTING class of HUD Code manufactured homes was the solution to the affordable housing crisis.

EricBelksyManufacturedHousingIndustryManufacuredHomeManufacturedHousingInstituteResearchDataAffordbleHousingMHProNewsDailyBuisnessNews575

Why did Belsky miss his predicted date? Because it came before Buffett’s entry into MH? See Smoking Gun 3.

So why this need for a new class of homes?  Why not rediscover the proven affordable HUD Code homes, already improved by the Manufactured Housing Improvement Act of 2000?

Two Great Laws Already on the Books NOW,  Can Unlock Billion$ Annually for Manufactured Housing Industry Businesse$, Investor$

 

If you want to encourage the acceptance of HUD Code manufactured homes, then this Clayton/MHI backed ‘new class of homes’ is demonstrably counterproductive on the surface.

Keep in mind that a researcher for the Fannie Mae Foundation some two decades ago already noted back then that manufactured homes merited better lending, placement, zoning, and other treatment. Such facts alone should make it hard for a GSE today to backtrack on their own foundation’s research.  For that report, see the link below.

 

“Why Advocates Need to Rethink Manufactured Home Quality,” Harvard, GSE, Genz, “High Satisfaction”

 

So, this new class of homes makes no sense, unless – unless – there is a hidden or unstated agenda?

  • Is this new class of homes just another monopolistic ploy to expand Berkshire’s Moat in MHVille?
  • And as has been noted previously, isn’t this once more using access to capital or lending to harm the interests of the majority of producers, in favor of one that is also selling site built housing?

 

Machiavellian “Godfather” – Sam Zell, Warren Buffett, Capital, Lending and Crossed Lines in Manufactured Housing

 

The Risk to Existing Manufactured Home Owners

Furthermore, isn’t there an obvious risk that the value of millions of existing manufactured homes will be undermined by this so-called new class of homes?

That isn’t a merely rhetorical question.  Because a senior contact with one of the GSEs admitted to MHProNews that it was a potential hazard.

How would millions of manufactured home owners react to not only not getting GSE chattel lending, but instead, having Clayton-led MHI working in a fashion that undermines the resale values of their homes?  Doesn’t that open the door to a possible class-action lawsuit, against the GSEs, MHI, and Clayton?

An MHI-only member messaged the following to our publisher this week, “You seem to have [a] conceptual IQ that is more important than spelling ability.” That’s nice and clever, but the matter is simply deductive reasoning or logic.

Everything that MHI has done with respect to their so-called new class of homes has been aimed to sideline opposition to it. That isn’t ‘forging consensus,’ is it? Isn’t that silencing opposition or reason-based concerns?

Isn’t what Clayton/Berkshire Hathaway lenders in manufactured housing want is to keep their choke-hold on lower-cost home lending, while promoting their own growing interests in conventional housing, all at the same time?

 

WHERE IS THE LOGIC OF HAVING MANUFACTURED HOMES THAT MAY AS WELL BE MODULARS?

Unless it was to derail GSE lending, and harm independents, all by another slight-of-hand?

All magic tricks are gimmicks, ploys – tricks. The hand is quicker than the eye. Something looks or sounds cool and good, and razzle dazzle presentations are built around it with high-cost consultants who will naturally say what the ones who wrote the check want said. That’s what a state association executive, an MHI member, has told MHProNews.

Some people will always follow a given con, that’s why tricks exist – they work on some people.

This new class of homes is a purported trick, and that is arguably why Richard ‘Dick’ Jennison would not go on with his public presentation at Louisville last January. He apparently feared having to answer questions from the Daily Business News or from members of the audience, who came armed with questions supplied by MHProNews.

 

 

It is also why Fannie Mae arguably cancelled an interview with MHProNews that their media contact had already agreed to do.  What caused that last minute cancellation?  Note that they cancelled only after they knew that among our questions would be some that focused on the genesis of how this new class of homes.

It’s Clayton and MHI, isn’t it?  How else does one explain that BOTH GSEs wanted the same thing?

 

MHARR Exposes GSES’ Failure On Chattel Financing Before Congress

 

What’s Overlooked

The genius of the HUD Code is performance-based standards that superseded other local housing code stipulations. That performance based method keeps housing costs lower for marginal buyers who won’t qualify for $150,000-$225,000 priced housing. Yet the HUD Code achieves that without sacrificing safety or durability.

MostMenAppearnNeverConsideredWhatHouseIsNeedlesslyPoorAllTheirLivesHenryDavidThoreauManufacturedHomeLivingNews

All of the above are HUD Code manufactured homes, built years before the Clayton-MHI backed new class of homes. Newcomers to the website not familiar with modern manufactured homes, learn more by clicking the image above or the link here.

 

There have long been those who argue the HUD vs MOD matter.  Our publisher said years ago that all of factory-built housing should agree not to undermine each other’s products.  Automakers don’t undermine entry-level cars when selling a Rolls Royce. Besides, more expensive modular homes can have their own headaches, as do site built housing, as a new report yesterday underscored.

 

“No Good Deed” – Brad Pitt, Make It Right Foundation Sued for Defective Modular Housing, NBC News, More Video

 

  • Let modular builders do whatever the law allows.
  • Let HUD Code builders build entry-level or more residential-style homes, in any ethical manner that they wish.
  • Ditto for tiny housing, prefab, conventional builders, and so on down the list of legitimate, safe and durable housing providers.

But the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA) which gave the Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs) of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac the Duty to Serve Manufactured Housing didn’t mandate any changes to the federal HUD Code.  The GSEs should be providing lending on entry level HUD Code homes, including chattel loans, not just on these pricey new semi-modular housing units.

ManufacturedHousingAssocRegulatoryReformMHARRMarkWeissDTSFHFA-GSEsGoingtoLargestBusinessesCorpAffiliatesDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

Collage by MHProNews.

 

This new class of homes is arguably a Trojan Horse, a blind alley, a grifters trick.

YouGetMoreOfWhatYouEncourageLessofWhatYouDiscourageMartyLavin

The logic of this statement can be applied to a variety of cases.

 

And sadly, the money trail and evidence – see links below – point to Clayton, 21st and Vanderbilt engineering this via MHI. That means that better lending would be unavailable to the majority of potential manufactured housing customers, as well as to those in communities or private land that may want to refinance their high cost Berkshire Hathaway loans at a lower rate.

 

KennyLipschutzQuotePoorJobOfLobbyinginMHIndustry-postedMHProNews48thMHINCClist

The charade calls for a federal investigation into MHI and the manufactured housing industry’s Berkshire brands, which sources suggest may already be underway.

SoTheAssociationMHIIsNotThereFortheIndustryUnlesstheinterestsoftheBigBoysJointheIndustry'sMartyLavinMHIAwardWinnerQuoteMHProNews

MHProNews looks at the facts, considers the sources, and follows the evidence. MHI earlier last year, and for years before, MHI routinely replied promptly to all inquiries. But since we’ve spotlighted the problems and concerns, they’ve gone silent. Why? If the facts are on their side, why not publicly make a cogent explanation?

 

Housing Choice should become part of the industry’s mantra. For our part, we will spotlight those issues that obscure the common-sense of making manufactured housing another ‘affordable housing choice‘ that home seekers can make with their heads held high, without having to jump through any special and limiting hoops.

 

Duty To Serve, “Complete Waste of Time” per Tim Williams, CEO/21st Mortgage; POTUS Trump, Warren Buffett Insight$

There’s more to come on this in the days ahead, so stay tuned to the only source in manufactured housing trade media that tackles the tough topics with facts, evidence, money trail, reason, and moxie. See the related reports, further below. “We Provide, You Decide.” © ##(News, analysis, and commentary.)

NOTICE: Readers have periodically reported that they are getting a better experience when reading MHProNews on the Microsoft Edge, or Apple Safari browser than with Google’s Chrome browser. Chrome reportedly manipulates the content of a page more than the other two.

(Related Reports are further below. Third-party images and content are provided under fair use guidelines.)

1) To sign up in seconds for our MH Industry leading emailed news updates, click here.

ManufacturedHomeIndustry#1HeadlineNewsMHProNews

To see a sample of our emailed news update, click here. To sign up for the factory-built home industry’s #1 headline news, click here or the graphic above.

2) To pro-vide a News Tips and/or Commentary, click the link to the left. Please note if comments are on-or-off the record, thank you.

3) Marketing, Web, Video, Consulting, Recruiting and Training Re-sources

SoheylaKovachDailyBusinessNewsMHProNewsMHLivingNewsSubmitted by Soheyla Kovach to the Daily Business News for MHProNews.com. Soheyla is a managing member of LifeStyle Factory Homes, LLC, the parent company to MHProNews, and MHLivingNews.com.

Related Reports:

“Take the MH Advantage Challenge – Can You Tell the Difference?” Fisk of Sarah Edelman, Director of Duty to Serve, Single-Family Mortgage Business for Fannie Mae

GSEs’ “Duty To Serve Underserved Markets” Plans

 

Fannie Mae Touts MH Advantage Program, But Manufactured Housing Association Slams Plan as “Illegitimate,” “Bait and Switch”

Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Berkshire Hathaway Backstory

Machiavellian “Godfather” – Sam Zell, Warren Buffett, Capital, Lending and Crossed Lines in Manufactured Housing

Bloomberg “New Home for $90,000? Manufactured Housing Is Making a Comeback” Reveals MH Media Challenge

 

Secretive “NEW” Class of Manufactured Housing Raises Serious Concerns

Warren Buffett, Charlie Munger, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Berkshire Hathaway Backstory

September 26th, 2018 Comments off

 

FanniMaeFreddieMacLogosGuruFocusBerkshireHathawayLogoCharlieMungerWarrenBuffettHollyLaFonPhotosDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews600

Arguably at the heart of the affordable housing crisis is an access to lending for the most affordable homes built in America, manufactured homes.The Enterprises” of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are mandated by the Housing and Economic Recovery Act (HERA 2008) to support manufactured home lending under the ‘Duty to Serve,’ or DTS for short.

 

The “Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (FMCC) (Freddie Mac), a government-sponsored home mortgage lender, was delivering 23% returns on equity and trading for less than eight times estimated earnings when Buffett touted the investment to Fortune Magazine in 1988,” writes Holly LaFon, an editor for GuruFocus.

You’ve got a low price/earnings ratio on a company with a terrific record,” Buffett told the magazine. “You’ve got growing earnings. And you have a stock that is bound to become much better known to equity investors.”

The Fortune article cited factors why Berkshire Hathaway Chairman Buffett and Charlie Munger, the Vice Chairman of Berkshire, were particularly attracted to Freddie Mac. ”I can’t think of a more tangible compliment to the stock than to buy every damn share we are allowed to,” Munger said.

By 2000, Berkshire was the largest shareholder of Freddie Mac, said LaFon, explaining that the “stock had soared to between $41 and $64 per share, for a sizable gain. His view on it changed, though, and he unloaded nearly all of his Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae shares that year, according to his testimony to the U.S. Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission in May 2010.”

HollyLaFonGuruFocusLinkedInCompositeDailyBusinessNewsMHProNEws

Brad Bondi, deputy general counselor of the commission, asked if Buffett if he sold because the stocks were no longer good investments.  Per GuruFocus, Buffett responded that he “didn’t know they weren’t going to be good investments” but became “concerned” about their management.

The Motley Fool, another investment-focused operation, said that Buffett colorfully said: I figure if you see just one cockroach, there’s probably a lot.”

They were trying to -– and proclaiming that they could increase earnings per share in some low double-digit range or something of the sort,” Buffett reportedly said. “And any time a large financial institution starts promising regular earnings increases, you’re going to have trouble, you know?”

Now, they are dealing essentially with government-guaranteed credit, so we know about that and we had it ratified subsequently about what has happened,” Buffett said. “So, here was an institution that was trying to serve two masters: Wall Street and their investors, and Congress.”

And the truth was that they were arbitraging the government’s credit, and for something that the government really didn’t intend for them to do,” the Berkshire chairman told the commission. “And, you know, there is seldom just one cockroach in the kitchen. You know, you turn on the light and, all of sudden, they all start scurrying around. And I couldn’t find the light switch, but I had seen one.”

The Daily Business News reported recently on a related commentary by Forbes contributor, David Marotta, who said that in 2012, that the entire presidential race should come down to a single question. “Who caused the financial crisis of 2008?” By the sounds of Buffett’s testimony, he didn’t cause it, but he did apparently believe that there was a crisis coming.

That crash, combined with other maneuvers linked below, led to a historic drop in manufactured housing shipments.

Figure1MobileManufacturedHomeSalesSHipmentsVsExistingingNewHouseSalesManufacturedHousingiinudstryDataMHProNews

Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae’s stock prices did not begin to crash until seven years later in 2007 when mounting home foreclosures led to unsustainable losses. In 2008, Buffett passed when Freddie Mac approached him about participating in a capital infusion. See that related report later, at the link below.

President Jimmy Carter Blasts Trump Administration on Affordable Housing, Carter’s Manufactured Home Ties

They’re [the GSEs, Fannie and Freddie] looking for help, obviously. And the scale of help is such that I don’t think it can come from the private sector,” Buffett told CNBC. Fannie and Freddie are still under the supervision of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA).

As regular Daily Business News readers know, there’s been a swirl of controversies around Mel Watt, FHFA, the GSEs, and the tepid way that the GSEs are meeting the decade old required Duty to Serve (DTS) manufactured housing. See related reports, further below.

Recall too that earlier this year, GuruFocus and Seattle Times, both did reports on Clayton Home and allegations of how Buffett’s manufactured housing brands engaged in monopolistic practices.

Seattle Times -Federal Investigations-Berkshire Hathaway’s Clayton Homes, GuruFocus Spotlights Buffett’s Clayton’s “Unethical,” Monopolistic Moat

There is no questioning the overall Buffett and Munger success at operating Berkshire’s investments. But does this once more spotlight some of the ways that success has occurred.  Upcoming related reports will be forthcoming in the days ahead. Stay tuned, and sign up for our emailed updates, further below at the right. That’s this evening’s “News through the lens of manufactured homes, and factory-built housing” © where “We Provide, You Decide.” © ## (News, analysis, and commentary.)

(Related Reports are further below. Third-party images and content are provided under fair use guidelines.)

1) To sign up in seconds for our MH Industry leading emailed news updates, click here.

ManufacturedHomeIndustry#1HeadlineNewsMHProNews

To see a sample of our emailed news update, click here. To sign up for the factory-built home industry’s #1 headline news, click here or the graphic above.

2) To pro-vide a News Tips and/or Commentary, click the link to the left. Please note if comments are on-or-off the record, thank you.

3) Marketing, Web, Video, Consulting, Recruiting and Training Re-sources

SoheylaKovachDailyBusinessNewsMHProNewsMHLivingNewsSubmitted by Soheyla Kovach to the Daily Business News for MHProNews.com. Soheyla is a managing member of LifeStyle Factory Homes, LLC, the parent company to MHProNews, and MHLivingNews.com.

Related Reports:

Duty To Serve, “Complete Waste of Time” per Tim Williams, CEO/21st Mortgage; POTUS Trump, Warren Buffett Insight$

 

Smoking Gun 3 – Warren Buffett, Kevin Clayton, Clayton Homes, 21st Mortgage Corp Tim Williams – Manufactured Home Lending, Sales Grab?

The Rich, Famous, PreFab Homes, Manufactured Housing, Hypocrisy, and You

 

“Why Advocates Need to Rethink Manufactured Home Quality,” Harvard, GSE, Genz, “High Satisfaction”

July 5th, 2018 Comments off

RichardGenzWhyAdvocatesNeedRethinkManufacturedHomeQualityHarvardGSEHighSatisfactionDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

There are those who slam manufactured housing as being less expensive due to inferior quality. But a “Harvard study refutes that, labeling as “exaggerated” the “concerns about the difference between manufactured homes…and [homes] built to applicable local building codes” (Vermeer and Louie 1995, section IV, 2). The study found that code standards have little to do with manufactured housing’s price advantage.”

 

So wrote Richard Genz in a 22 page research report on manufactured homes for a foundation for a Government Sponsored Enterprise (GSE).

The document also stated that:

Housing advocates might find it surprising to walk through a couple of new homes at a dealer’s lot, keeping the monthly payment in mind and mentally comparing the local rental stock available for the same price. Interiors have good light. Insulation standards are solid. Floor plans have come a long way from the time when residents said that living in a mobile home was like living in a hallway.”

RichardGenzManufacturedHousingIndustryDailyBusinessNewsMHproNewsWhy take a flashback look now at the 2001 report by Richard Genz for Housing & Community Insight?

Because the report was done for the Fannie Mae Foundation.

It cited sources such as Harvard, Foremost Insurance – plus other third-party, often peer-reviewed – researchers.

While some of the data points have shifted since Genz penned them, it has generally been improvements in the manufactured home product quality, as the Manufactured Housing Improvement Act of 2000 standards have fully kicked in since Genz published his insightful work.

It’s equally valid to review this now, given the arguable short-shrift Fannie Mae has been giving to the legally mandated Duty to Serve (DTS) implementation. Compare what Genz said then, vs. what Sarah Edelman recently wrote. That linked report below, which includes Edelman’s article for Fannie Mae, can be read later for greater depth of understanding.

“Take the MH Advantage Challenge – Can You Tell the Difference?” Fisk of Sarah Edelman, Director of Duty to Serve, Single-Family Mortgage Business for Fannie Mae

Further, because the HUD Code and new home standards keep improving, what was true when Genz said it back then, is arguably as or more accurate now.

NewDurhamEstatesSouthManufacturedHomeLivingNewsDailyBusinessNewsMHProNEws

That said, the analysis that follows notes that while Genz often praised manufactured homes, he did not turn a blind eye to problems then existing in the industry. That too will be reviewed herein, because manufactured housing cleaned up key issues that Genz identified.

So, while the total numbers of residents and manufactured homes has grown since his report, and pricing has obviously changed, the percentage of savings remains the same. Then and now, the United States Census Bureau has noted consistently similar levels of statistical savings for decades.

SunCommunitiesSUI-InvestorPage11ManufacturedHomeVsSingleFamilyHousingManufacturedHomeCommunitiesIndustryDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews600

Graphic, data, per Sun Communities (SUI).

Thus for a variety of reasons, Genz’s 22 page document merit the careful consideration of the manufactured home industry’s:

  • professionals,
  • advocates,
  • public policy pros,
  • politicos,
  • and investors careful consideration.
SunCommunitiesSUI-InvestorPageComparetoMultiFamilyHousing10ManufacturedHomeCommunitiesIndustryDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews600

Graphic, data, per publicly-traded Sun Communities (SUI).  Note that Sun’s rental rates may be higher than some others in the industry..

With that introduction, the Daily Business News will review and analyze key highlights of what Genz unearthed.

It’s a potentially multiple billions of dollars worth of housing insights. Thus it’s a potentially rewarding, and highly insightful, reading experience.  As you read this analysis of Genz, keep the points previously shared in the report below in mind, which can be read or reviewed later for related insights.

YIMBY vs. NIMBY, Obama Admin Concept Could Unlock $1.95 Trillion Annually, HUD & MH Impact

 

Stigma and Manufactured Homes

Genz goes after the stigma attached to manufactured homes and their owners early, and often.

Here’s an example.

There is a palpable stigma attached to manufactured homes, dating back to when workers towing trailers moved from city to city, chasing jobs and crowding into muddy, unsanitary trailer parks… However, these serious shortcomings [in public policies, perceptions] are not inherent in the factory-built home itself. Rather, they are the product of laws, policy choices, and business practices that are selling millions of people short.”

Genz notes that while values weren’t the same, he explains that it was because of reasons not connected with the homes themselves.

That’s arguably a valid point then, and now.

The Fannie Mae Foundation researcher also noted that the net worth of manufactured home owners was dramatically higher – even then – than the $5,000 renting households average worth now have, per data cited repeatedly by HUD Secretary Ben Carson last year.

Median net worth is $59,000 for owners of manufactured homes, compared with $102,000 for all homeowners.”

Rephrasing that as a takeaway.  Those who own a manufactured home enjoy a significant improvement in their collective standard of living.  That’s a point that advocates like ROC USA, Prosperity Now (formerly known as CFED), or this trade publisher have often made.

Genz notes another point that MHLivingNews and MHProNews has hammered home repeatedly. It’s this.

One of the industry’s strong points is its appeal to distinctly different market segments. Owners tend to be either very young or elderly (Vermeer and Louie 1995). Although most buyers have low incomes, one segment of the market is quite well off: About 10 percent of manufactured home residents report a net worth of more than $250,000, and another 19 percent are worth more than $100,000 (Foremost Insurance Group 1999).”

Genz added to that point above, “Many of the owners with high net worth live in well- planned subdivision-style communities with recreation centers, pools, and even golf courses. These high-end communities demonstrate the potential of factory-built homes, but also represent a continuing shift away from the industry’s original focus on serving the affordable housing market.”

 

tristar-estates-bourbonnais-il-CreditMHC-MD-com, posted MHPorNews.com.

Arial photo credit, TriStar Estate, credit MHC-MD.com. Note that all of the illustrations shown were provided by MHProNews, not the original document written by Genz.

Stated differently, he makes sure that his readers know that manufactured homes are not just housing for the poor, or those who have no other options.

It’s a key factoid that some in the industry’s association world need to take notice of, and perhaps now will begin to do so?

Despite wide-spread perceptions of low quality and short life, Consumer Reports says that “manufactured housing can last as long as site-built housing,” (“Manufactured Housing ” 1998, 30).”

Readers should keep in mind that the improvements mandated by the industry-sought Manufactured Housing Improvement Act of 2000 (MHIA). So whatever concerns were noted then about installation have since been dealt with.

Industry professionals, policy wonks, officials, and advocates should note that it was the Manufactured Housing Association for Regulatory Reform (MHARR) that led-the-charge for the MHIA 2000. They did so by aligning the Texas Manufactured Housing Association’s leadership, and then finally found a change in leadership at the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) they could work with. That permitted the three to then advance the MHIA through Congress, per our sources.

That segue noted, the review of Genz’s fertile work continues.

Fresh, new, private living space; easy shopping and financing; adequate quality; and homeownership now add up to a powerful appeal, and with a little reflection, it becomes easier to see why manufactured homes have been chosen by an average of 29 percent of new home buyers every year since 1980 (Manufactured Housing Institute 2001).”

MostMenAppearnNeverConsideredWhatHouseIsNeedlesslyPoorAllTheirLivesHenryDavidThoreauManufacturedHomeLivingNews

For newcomers to this website, or otherwise not familiar with modern manufactured homes, you can learn more by clicking the image above or the link here.

That was debatably the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI) that was, prior to the power being exercised over the Arlington, VA based trade group by Berkshire Hathaway acquired Clayton Homes in 2003. Their related lenders were acquired too, as were several other industry connected suppliers and other firms since.

Instead of MHI’s allegedly weaponized ‘research’ and maneuvers to promote a controversial, “new class of homes,” and the like – why hasn’t MHI provided encouragement for more such independent study as Genz did?

Or why does MHI fail to publicly mine such useful research today?

Those questions noted, continuing with the Genz’s analysis, there are far more gems to discover.  They are potentially as useful now as then.

 

Not Enough Advocacy, Said Genz

RichardGenzHousingCommunityInsightLinkedInSydexManufacturedHousingIndustryDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

Richard Genz.

Some consumer advocacy is taking place, but not much in view of the scale of the manufactured housing sector. Government, nonprofit, and philanthropic involvement is strikingly less than in the world of “real homes.”

When one ponders the foot-dragging by the GSEs, apparently brooked by the FHFA, this quote is also noteworthy: “…a majority of buyers have held the same job for 5 to 10 years, a Freddie Mac economist notes that “except for lower incomes, the profile of manufactured home buyers seeking financing does not appear to differ greatly from site-built loan borrowers” (Bradley 1997, 4).

Note that in a systematic fashion, Genz cited his third-party, often peer-reviewed sources. Again, as the Daily Business News analysis above noted, much of what has changed since 2001 have been equally well documented improvements.

So the case made by Genz is still useful.  It is also historic.

Genz provides an independent yardstick to see what the industry’s ‘leaders’ have or have not done.

 

Identifying Valid Concerns

For those who never knew or witnessed sellers loading up customers with years of insurance or credit life, etc. the next quote will be a dose of reality.

For those pros who will recall, it’s a blast-from-the-past that explains some of the stiff losses by the subprime lenders of that era. “[manufactured housing] retailers can and frequently do earn commissions, rebates, or other payments on loan originations, credit life insurance, property insurance, and other services arranged for at the time the loan is closed” (HUD and NAHB 2000, 41).”

That was then, not now. Thus the report by Genz isn’t all glowing, as he takes on some industry practices in lending, some that apparently had a level of MHI support.

Rephrased, this researcher for Fannie didn’t mind questioning MHI.

By contrast today, Fannie and MHI seem to be “playing footsie,” according to several sources in MHI.

Among the examples that have been cited by those sources, MHARR and others, is that Fannie is now a MHI member. Furthermore, Fannie and MHI have reportedly held closed door meetings, without producing for the public those meeting minutes.

What’s there to hide?

Fannie Mae Touts MH Advantage Program, But Manufactured Housing Association Slams Plan as “Illegitimate,” “Bait and Switch”

 

GSE Commitment Canceled?

As recently as last week, Sarah Edelman, Director of Duty to Serve, Single-Family Mortgage Business at Fannie Mae and others there respectfully declined to provide minutes or any explanation of such meetings with MHI, in inquiries by this publication to the federally regulated mortgage giant.

Note that a communications team member committed to MHProNews that Edelman would answer several questions on-the-record.

Those promised replies to several specific inquiries were later delayed. Finally, the same communications team member at Fannie said they were not going to answer the questions asked.

Why not?

So much for transparency at Fannie today?

It is also worth mentioning for later review that House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling has told MHProNews via a statement that he has serious concerns about lobbying by the GSE.  If so, that’s important because it would be in contravention to federal law while they are in receivership under FHFA. That related report can be reviewed later, and is linked below.

Update on Fannie Mae Lobbying, and Manufactured Housing Controversy

 

How Many Pre-HUD Code Mobile Homes?

Back to the research by Genz, he stated then that nearly 3 million pre-HUD Code mobile homes were still in service.

According to Gentz, “As many as 3 million homes in the nation’s current manufactured housing inventory were built be- fore the implementation of the HUD building code in 1976, when some homes had a useful life as short as 10 years (Meeks 1995; Vermeer and Louie 1995). Many of these were built in the boom years of 1968 through 1973, when 2.7 million new homes were sold.”

TrailerHouseMobileHomeManufacturedHomeFactoryBuiltHousingEvolution101MHProNews-MHLivingNews

Make a habit of using the correct terminology.

Once more an aside is warranted. Because the data that Genz cited demonstrates that the Rollohome experience was not a one-off.

What occurred during the Rollohome era in terms of the rapid ramp up and production of more factory built housing pre-HUD Code could arguably be done today too.

Rollohome, Creating 60,000 Factory-Built Homes in 2 Years

Investors, public officials, advocates, and industry pros? Are you seeing how enormous the manufactured housing industry’s potential is? This is a theme that MHProNews and MHARR have said for years can be accomplished, because it has in fact already been previously proven to be doable.

Given the correct support, the 8.3 million housing unit shortages cited by Lawrence Yun at the National Association of Realtors (NAR) could rapidly be corrected. But if HUD Code producers don’t step up to the plate more seriously, other prefab builders cited at the end of this report have already said that they will.

Potentially tens to hundreds of billions of dollars in business annually is up for grabs.

Once more, it is almost inescapable how these facts point to what award-winning independent retailer Alan Amy said. Manufactured Housing could be the future, which is why he and others have said that the billionaires are gobbling up the industry’s assets.


Ouch, and another Ouch, but then…

Regarding gains or losses in value, “…Consumers Union reports that two-thirds of units depreciate. However, the converse is that one-third of manufactured homes have held their value or appreciated (“Manufactured Housing” 1998). Several other studies establish the simple fact that some manufactured homes increase in value, and some decline.

But Genz uses logic akin to what MHProNews has utilized, noting that “Research is needed to sort out the factors that cause values to go up or down. With better information, policies and practices that build wealth for owners of manufactured homes can be designed.

In fact, Genz has outlined several of the causes of a loss in value. He also suggested some of the keys to supporting value, like no more credit life or others previously noted.

Thus, the initial groundwork for more appreciation – which even the problematic Urban Institute report noted by the Daily Business News said is already underway – is now largely in place.

Rephrased, there are no valid reasons for the GSEs to slow-walk implementation of robust yet sustainable chattel and other manufactured home lending. There is no need for yet another apparent dodge, this time in the form of a MHI’s questionable “new class of homes.”

Secretive “NEW” Class of Manufactured Housing Raises Serious Concerns

So in retrospect, what Genz laid out was this.

marty-lavin-jd-manufacturedhomefinanceexpert-DailyBusinessNews-mhpronews

Marty Lavin, JD.

When insurance is loaded up on a contract at the time of sale, or prices may vary 5k-10k per identical homes in the same market, the natural outcome is those homes ‘lost’ value. That’s similar to concerns that MHI award winner Marty Lavin raised for years.

But it must also be noted that Lavin said in a video interview with MHProNews that the industry cleaned up that act.

So once more, the rationale for slow-walking the potentially robust GSE entry into manufactured housing is missing.

Quite the opposite exists. Genz gave a veritable road map of why and how manufactured housing lending could and should be done successfully in ways that are as sustainable, as Titus Dare exclusively encouraged in statements to MHProNews.

So those abuses Genz reported then were wrenched from the chattel lending system by the lenders who remained in the market during the post-Conseco/GreenTree meltdown.

Rephrased, as Lavin noted, the remaining marketplace lenders corrected the issues.

Said Genz, “The accurate answer to the question “Can manufactured homes appreciate?” seems to be “It depends.” Like the value of any home, the value of a manufactured home over time is contingent on many factors. Unfortunately, the perception that depreciation is somehow inherent in manufactured homes is widespread. It is at the root of disinterest about them among development bankers, advocates, planners, and nonprofit developers. These professionals are rightly concerned that housing should be a foundation for building wealth, but if advocates simply write off the preference of so many home buyers for lower-cost manufactured units, we passively contribute to a problem we should be helping to solve. Available data suggest that depreciation is not a mystery. It can be understood and, in many cases, reversed.”

What Genz did was argue that the industry could reverse much of its image and fortunes.

Make some common sense changes, and much could be done.

More than 8 out of 10 manufactured homes placed in 1998 were titled as personal property, or chattel (U.S. Bureau of the Census 1998).” That number is similar today.

Genz buys into the argument made by those who want to reclassify manufactured homes, forcing all to be real estate loans. That’s a non-starter for most lenders in the industry. It is an example of how the “wheat and chaff” approach must be used with any person, or any organization.

That said, he next makes another point similar to what Marty Lavin has made.

Discriminatory treatment of manufactured home residents flows from the unexamined matrix of law, finance, taxation, land use regulation, and custom within which manufactured housing exists.”

Lavin put it more bluntly, by calling the HUD Code “a discrimination code.”

But discrimination – past or present – could be a motivation in urging industry pros to act for change in the future.

That said, what exists today are policies that can include “…many tax systems automatically depreciate manufactured homes like vehicles, regardless of their actual market value. This practice worsens the budget drain.”

Genz demonstrates how a simple change of mind can yield positive change.

Recognizing the real character of manufactured housing contributes to the asset base of an entire community. For example, the tax assessor of Henderson County, NC, decided to begin taking manufactured homes seriously in the early 1990s. Once values were established, the assessor determined that the use of depreciation schedules had systematically undervalued this stock of residential property. The result was a $53 million increase in the tax rolls over two years,” Genz said.

Then he stated a point routinely made by MHLivingNews and MHProNews. How education by that North Carolina county and discipline in the proper use of terminology could yield positive changes measurable in dollars and cents.

They [local officials] repeatedly had to explain to concerned taxpayers that a “trailer” is something you haul around behind a vehicle and that their increased valuation was based on the actual market value of a home that happened to have been built in a factory.”

Today, there are numerous studies that demonstrate that manufactured homes can and do appreciate for the same reasons as conventional housing. But the way to accomplish that isn’t by creating a problematic, unnecessary, and controversial “new class of homes” promoted by MHI.

Rather, an important part of the industry’s potential progress is achieved by education of consumers on existing homes.

 

 

That education comes in part by speaking with those who know on camera.

Education also can obviously be accomplished in part by engaging the mainstream media.

Retiring MHI Ann Parman previously praised MHProNews publisher L. A. “Tony” Kovach for promoting that plan. But as numerous industry members – like Frank Rolfe, who previously blasted MHI for not properly engaging the media – know, MHI has allowed most slurs, miscues, and errors that slight manufactured housing to go unaddressed.

Rephrased, the facts and legitimate third-party research needed to successfully promote the manufactured home industry are available.

While the Arlington, VA based trade group has done problematic advertorials – which have at times cited ‘facts’ that other MHI ‘data’ contradicts – has posted a few lightly viewed items to YouTube, or social media, there’s been no discernible, systematic and robust effort by them to defend and/or promote the industry as needed.

MHI member MHVillage’s own data proves just how ineffective the efforts to date are.

2018-06-22_0521ConversionRatiosPerMHVillageLogoManufacturedHousingIndustryDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews600

Data per MHVillage, collage by MHProNews. 

So it is little wonder that a pair of state associations broke away from MHI, and have announced they are forming a new post-production association.

Rephrased, there is a growing body of evidence and numbers of industry voices that in various ways have alleged that MHI is debatably blowing it for the small to mid-sized operations that make numbers of that trade group’s members.

‘Tip of Iceberg’ – Rick Rand; Marty Lavin, Communities have ‘No Confidence’ in Manufactured Housing Institute, New National Trade Group Announced

As attorney Lavin succinctly put it in the report linked above, the big boys work for the interests of the rest of the industry only to the extent that it benefits the big boys.

 

Genz Makes the Case Concerned Industry Voices Have Advocated

Said the Fannie Mae Foundation’s researcher Genz. “Low- and moderate-income people should not be left to learn about asset-building and the meaning of homeownership from their tax assessor. The protests from mobile home dwellers confirm what our housing system has inculcated in them: that their housing is a depreciating asset, like a vehicle. How many buyers of conventional homes would trade a lower annual property tax bill for depreciating home value?


As a Deer Valley Homes sales manager James McGee, and their current president, Chet Murphree said, “It’s all about education.” as they and others praised the work done here and on MHProNews to educate.

Meanwhile, sources and evidence suggest that MHI, their surrogates and masters, have arguably sought to stymie the education necessary for the industry’s robust growth.

Why?

Warren Buffet has arguably given the correct answer. He likes a bargain.

Best Warren Buffett, Kevin Clayton, Clayton Homes, Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting, Competition, and “the Moat” Video Collection

By choking off other sources of lending, and limiting the capital flow into the industry, Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway has gobbled up large chunks of the industry.

ClaytonHomesOakwoodHomesBerkshireHathawayMarketShareofManufacturedHousingEndof2003DailyBuisnessNewsMHanufacturedHousingIndustryProNews

MHI’s President Richard “Dick” Jennison, and others there or working for Berkshire Hathaway units have declined or ducked public discussion and debate on such vexing questions.

ClaytonHomesSkylineChampionCavcoIndustriesBalanceofIndustryManufacturedHousingIndustryConsolidationGraphicPieChartMHProNews

Graphic by MHProNews, using information provided by each corporation, or named entities.

Isn’t that a kind of tacit admission that these published concerns are valid?

When The Daily Business News has given repeated opportunities for MHI or Berkshire brands to respond publicly, why have they instead remained silent?

21stMortgageCorpLogoLetterheadJan302009TimWilliamsRetailersBrokersCutSpecifiedLendingMonopolisticPloyConcernManufacturedHomeDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

This document was provided as a news tip to MHProNews. To see the related video with Kevin Clayton, click to read and view – Smoking Gun 3

Duty To Serve, “Complete Waste of Time” per Tim Williams, CEO/21st Mortgage; POTUS Trump, Warren Buffett Insight$

 

Genz’s Finale “Conclusion”

Clearing up misperceptions about manufactured housing and addressing the problems of buyers, owners, and renters should be the first priority for advocates. On a separate front, it should be possible to incorporate the cost advantages of manufactured homes into nonprofit housing developments (Wallis 1991). If stereotypes can be overcome, the nonprofit development community could eventually help reinvent manufactured homes as quality, wealth-building, affordable housing.

The report said that author “Richard Genz is Principal of Housing & Community Insight and a Project Manager with ICF Consulting, Inc.”

Genz’s report was written for the Fannie Mae Foundation.  The entire document is available as a download, linked here.

We Provide, You Decide.” © ## ## (News, event, and announcement.)

(Third party images, and content are provided under fair use guidelines.)

Related Reports:

Manufactured Home Owners – Satisfaction Survey Redux

Progressive “Nation” Reports on Monopolies Cites Buffett, Clayton, Others – MH Industry Impact?

 

Clayton Homes, Top 25 Manufactured Housing Industry Report, Trend Lines

 

ConfidentialNewsTipsOKTipsIreportMHNews@MHMSM-comGraphic

To report a news tip, click the image above or send an email to iReportMHNewsTips@mhmsm.com – To help us spot your message in our volume of email, please put the words NEWS TIP in the subject line.

1) To sign up in seconds for our MH Industry leading emailed news updates, click here.EmailedMHProNewsHeadlineNewsDailyBusinessNews

2) To provide a News Tips and/or Commentary, click the link to the left. Please note if comments are on-or-off the record, thank you.

3) Marketing, Web, Video, Consulting, Recruiting and Training Resources

SoheylaKovachDailyBusinessNewsMHProNewsMHLivingNewsSubmitted by Soheyla Kovach to the Daily Business News for MHProNews.com. Soheyla is a managing member of LifeStyle Factory Homes, LLC, the parent company to MHProNews, and MHLivingNews.com.

“Take the MH Advantage Challenge – Can You Tell the Difference?” Fisk of Sarah Edelman, Director of Duty to Serve, Single-Family Mortgage Business for Fannie Mae

June 16th, 2018 Comments off
TakeMHAdvantageChallengeCanYouTellTheDifferenceFiskofSarahEdelmanDirectorDutyToserveSingleFamilyFannieMaePhotoLogoDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

Collage by MHProNews. Photo of Sarah Edelman, credit, The New Deal.

Most people wouldn’t recognize today’s factory-built homes. The manufactured housing industry has diversified and enhanced the models available so they can blend seamlessly into traditional neighborhoods of site-built homes, offering comparable amenities and curb appeal,” said Sarah Edelman, Director of Duty to Serve, Single-Family Mortgage Business.

 

Her open is solid, and seemingly positive.

At Fannie Mae, we’re enhancing our mortgage financing options to keep pace with these important changes,” Edelman continued.

This trend toward modern designs is a smart way to meet demand from growing segments of buyers, including millennials, downsizing baby boomers, and first-time homebuyers. These buyers and others are looking to manufactured housing as an affordable option providing quality and value in a market where the supply of site-built housing is low and prices are high. Quite simply, manufactured housing is a key opportunity to address our growing affordable housing crisis,” said the Fannie Mae executive, on an article that was published 6.5.2018.

Ten days ago, her Fannie Mae “Perspective” was the top article on the Government Sponsored Enterprise (GSE) website.

But today, a week and a half later, that positive sounding article about manufactured homes is no longer visible on the Fannie Mae home page.

Now, comes what industry insiders – who’ve scrutinized her comments – are calling the veiled blow from the “perspective” of that GSE.

That’s why we introduced MH Advantage mortgage, an affordable financing option that recognizes the similarity of many manufactured homes to traditional site-built homes by offering the same conventional mortgage financing – including down payments as low as 3%, lower interest rates than most traditional manufactured home loans, and cancellable mortgage insurance,” Edelman said.

Homes that are eligible for MH Advantage have features that make them look more like traditional site-built homes including eaves and higher roof pitches, lower profile foundations, garages or carports, porches, dormers, upgraded interiors, and more,” she wrote.

Rephrased, what that means is that the bulk of manufactured homes being sold by HUD Code manufactured housing producers are NOT included in the Fannie Mae MH Advantage program.

That’s been confirmed to the Daily Business News by MHI connected sources familiar with this MH Advantage program.

These homes are now easily identified by a new MH Advantage “Mortgage Financing Notice” applied by participating manufacturers. This MH Advantage “sticker” makes it easy for retailers, shoppers, lenders, and others involved in the mortgage process to identify eligible homes when they’re bought, sold, or refinanced. It’s something interested buyers should look for and ask about, said Edelman.

What hasn’t been made known yet by her or others is

  • what percentage of Fannie Mae’s loans are going to be allocated to this program?
  • Or are the majority of manufactured homes going to be excluded from Fannie Mae lending?
  • Why doesn’t Edelman’s column make it clear that these loans are land/home, as opposed to chattel?

Why aren’t the answers to those questions part of the article?  Or where is a Fannie Mae FAQ for this topic? Or why aren’t other necessary facts being made known?

PaulBarrettoFannieMaeSpeakingAtTunicaShowMarch2018ManufacturedHousingIndustryDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

Photo from March, 2018. To see his news making remarks there, click here

Why?

Because Fannie Mae won’t answer those or other related questions.

Perhaps this prior reply from Paul Barretto, at Fannie Mae, to the Daily Business News gives industry readers, public officials, investors, and affordable housing policy advocates a clue.

I’m sorry I can’t talk beyond what I presented…,” Barretto said in a message to MHProNews

Barretto, Sarah Edelman, their media office, and others contacted over the course of several days at Fannie Mae all declined commenting.

Why?

If Fannie Mae actually wants to promote this program, why not do so for free on the manufactured home industry’s most widely read news source? Who is hiding what, and why?

 

Industry Pro Says MH Advantage Defies the Purpose of the Duty to Serve (DTS)

The now-missing-from-their-home-page article by Edelman doesn’t note the complaint lodged by MHARR to Fannie Mae.

The Manufactured Housing Association for Regulatory Reform (MHARR)’s president and CEO, Mark Weiss, JD, said this program was “unacceptable” to that organization or their members for several reasons.

Weiss also said the MH Advantage plan was an “illegitimate,” “bait and switch.” Related articles, like the one linked below, can be read later for more details.

Fannie Mae Touts MH Advantage Program, But Manufactured Housing Association Slams Plan as “Illegitimate,” “Bait and Switch”

Among the reasons Weiss objects on behalf of independent manufacturers and their customers, is because MH Advantage “defied” the core principles of Duty to Serve (DTS), which was mandated in 2008 by the Housing and Economic Recovery Act (HERA).

Weiss said the GSEs have successfully ducked the law for a decade.

DTS is supposed to be about giving access to potentially millions of American to more affordable housing, specifically by providing lending for affordable manufactured homes.  That would benefit people otherwise trapped in rentals.  It could also reduce the costs for government subsidized housing programs, while creating more tax revenues for the states those manufactured homes are sold in.

DutyToServeManufacturedHousingMMarkWeissJDPresidentMHARR-MHProNews--575x191

Instead, what Fannie Mae’s program is doing with MH Advantage is arguably creating a more costly, separate class of manufactured homes, all of which will sell at a higher price-point than the majority of what the industry currently offers.

How will that help lower income consumers? How does that boost job creation by the builders of lower cost homes?  Who does the Fannie Mae plan benefit?

Weiss’ comments indicate they answer queries like those as follows.

ManufacturedHousingAssocRegulatoryReformMHARRMarkWeissDTSFHFA-GSEsGoingtoLargestBusinessesCorpAffiliatesDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

Collage by MHProNews.

Edelman’s article continued as follows.

We believe MH Advantage is an innovation whose time has come, but we remain committed to traditional manufactured homes, manufactured housing communities, and their important role as sources of affordable housing. In fact, Fannie Mae provided more than $9 billion in financing for manufactured housing in the past two years. And we’ll continue working with our partners to expand access to high-quality home rental and ownership opportunities in every market, every day,” Edelman concluded her column on the Fannie Mae website.

An unedited version of her article will be found later here as a download, or on their website, at this link here.

 

A Look at Sarah Edelman’s Resume 

An industry source with ties to the development of Fannie Mae’s MH Advantage program confirmed for MHProNews that Edelman is fairly new with the giant GSE.

SarahEdelmanPhotoDirectorOfHousingPolicyCenterProgressFannieMaeDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

Other industry sources in lending, and who are MHI members, told MHProNews that part of the DTS commitment to manufactured housing is going to be this MH Advantage program.  Those sources could not say with certainty what that percentage would be.  Again, Fannie Mae is mum.

Since when is silence to the media a “pro-growth” progressive virtue?

SarahEdelmanLinkedInPhotoProfileBioResumeFannieMaeDailyBusinessNewsManufacturedHosuingIndustryMHProNews510

 

What MHI Connected Sources, and Manufacturers Say

MHI connected sources could not say with certainty how close the design specifications for the MH Advantage program are to MHI’s highly touted, but thin on public details, ‘new class of HUD Code manufactured homes.’

The controversy-plagued Arlington, VA association president and CEO Richard “Dick” Jennison, plus other MHI staffers, have refused to engage with more details.  Why not?

If they are proud of the facts, why not get the widest possible publicity?  If the national trade goup aren’t proud of their plan to talk about it openly, then what have they got to hide?

 

Does Your Firm Sell News Entry-Level Manufactured Homes?

Does the plan favor big companies over smaller independent producers or retailers?  The indications are, yes.

By implication, doesn’t “the new class of homes” and Fannie Mae’s “MH Advantage” restrict lending, and thus trade, on the majority of manufactured homes produced?  Isn’t that part of the federal definition of barred activity under anti-trust laws?

Again, related articles linked above and below can be read later for more details.

Secretive “NEW” Class of Manufactured Housing Raises Serious Concerns

 

But there was wide agreement among MHI members who commented for this report that the two sets of standards – Fannie Mae’s “MH Advantage,” and MHI’s so-called “new class of homes” – may be the same.

All of this should be deeply concerning to public officials, affordable housing advocates, the vast majority of the manufactured housing industry’s professionals, investors, and the Trump Administration.

One source asserted that they are informed about the MH Advantage program, and favored it. When asked by MHProNews, that source admitted that the prior MH Select had little traction in the market.

That source also admitted that this new MH Advantage program could create problems for manufacturers that are not selling this kind of product.  ‘But Fannie Mae will be reviewing the [DTS] program in three years, and if it is harming manufacturers or the market, they can change it at that time,’ that  person said.

An MHI only member manufacturer expressed outrage over the plan to split the majority of the industry’s homes in two by misusing DTS in this fashion, saying it was an insult to the industry.

A careful read of Edelman’s article reveals that while it sounds like praise, MH Advantage is a de facto put-down of any home that doesn’t meet their standards.

Applying the logic of MHI award-winner Marty Lavin’s quote below – if successful – what this will do is cause fewer existing types of manufactured homes to be sold over time.

YouGetMoreOfWhatYouEncourageLessofWhatYouDiscourageMartyLavin

The logic of this statement can be applied to a variety of cases.

The Daily Business News and the Masthead have raised concerns about the lack of transparency and contradictions surrounding the DTS program.

Manufactured Housing’s “Trojan Horse”

MHProNews noted MHI’s “new class of homes” could be a “Trojan Horse” for the industry.  The fact that this program was allegedly created in secrecy is itself a warning that possible anti-trust prohibited actions could have taken place.

The history of back and forth support and opposition to DTS by Tim Williams – former MHI chairman and the president and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway owned 21st Mortgage –  could be red flags.

Much of this could be cleared up if MHI and the GSEs released their closed-door meeting minutes.  But they have refused to do so.

Or it could be cleared up, if the parties involved simply, candidly answered a series of on-the-record questions, with those replies given by informed Fannie Mae and other related personnel.  Isn’t that just common sense?

The obvious logical conclusion to the various controversies, allegations, and concerns are that the parties involved with this MH Advantage and the DTS program don’t want clarity, because they are deliberately being opaque.

FiskingFiskDefinitionYourDictionaryManufacturedHousingIndustryDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

 

The View from the Masthead

MHProNews publisher L. A. “Tony” Kovach has said that the principles Marty Lavin has laid out need to be applied in this case.

Kovach said that the industry must consider pretty words, platitudes, and overdue promises made to the manufactured housing based upon experience.  “Promises and pleasant words have often have resulted in little or no useful action for the majority of the manufactured home industry’s members,” Kovach said.

MHI award-winner Lavin, is an attorney who served for years with the Arlington, VA based trade body, and served a GSE as well.  He has offered a general summation on tip for reading the industry’s tea leaves, which could be applied to this scenario.

They are paraphrased in the following three bullets.

  • Follow the money.
  • Pay more attention to what people do than what they say.
  • MHI works only for the interests of theirbig boymembers, and the interests of the smaller MHI members are served only when they align with the interests of the big boys.

‘Tip of Iceberg’ – Rick Rand; Marty Lavin, Communities have ‘No Confidence’ in Manufactured Housing Institute, New National Trade Group Announced

It is for similar concerns and failures to properly serve them that the AZ and NV community associations have laid the foundation for a new, national post-production association, quitting MHI last year.

Fannie Mae announced they are an MHI member. Associations lobby.

House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling issued a statement to MHProNews that protested Fannie’s alleged involvement in lobbying, which they are currently prohibited by FHFA from doing. See that, and more, linked under related resources, below.

Update on Fannie Mae Lobbying, and Manufactured Housing Controversy

MHI, members of Berkshire Hathaway brands, and Fannie Mae were contacted by the Daily Business News and asked to react to MHARR’s formal protest to Fannie.  None of them has weighed in as of this writing.

By contrast, when MHProNews asks most state associations for comment, a prompt reply – albeit sometimes off the record – are common.

Recall that Smoking Gun 3 documented related concerns over how cutting off or limiting lending put hundreds of companies out of business, some of which had been in the industry for decades.

Smoking Gun 3 – Warren Buffett, Kevin Clayton, Clayton Homes, 21st Mortgage Corp Tim Williams – Manufactured Home Lending, Sales Grab?

As publisher Kovach told a mainstream media reporter last week, the reality of the challenges in manufactured housing for thousands of companies can be summed up in two words. “Rigged system.”

The trend is toward what appears to be an artificially created consolidation of the industry.  Why artificial?  Because the nation has an affordable housing crisis, and yet the industry is still constricting, debatably due in part by restricting the lending available to independents.

ClaytonHomesSkylineChampionCavcoIndustriesBalanceofIndustryManufacturedHousingIndustryConsolidationGraphicPieChartMHProNews

Graphic by MHProNews, using information provided by each corporation, data from HUD, MHARR, or other named entities.

The linked reports provide evidence plus reasons how capital, credit, nonprofits, and MHI have been among the tools used to consolidate the industry, to the advantage of a few at the cost to the many.

An executive level industry reader told MHProNews,You need to create an ‘I told you so’ list, to remind the [manufactured home] industry when warnings and concerns have proven to be accurate.”  Please put this topic, first raised over a year ago, among those.

We Provide, You Decide.” ©  ## (News, analysis, and commentary.)

(Third party image, and/or content, are provided under fair use guidelines.)

Related Reports:

‘Over Target’ Reactions, WHA Exec (ret) Ross Kinzler, Won’t Defend MHI Policies & Points to Prior MHI Failure

Update on Fannie Mae Lobbying, and Manufactured Housing Controversy

Manufactured Housing Institute “Walk Out,” “Cover Up,” and Shock at their Vegas Event

 

Wisconsin Housing Alliance – an MHI ‘Affiliate’ – Amy Bliss’ Messages Raise New Anti-Trust Issue

 

 

NorthStar and Manufactured Housing Radix

 

ConfidentialNewsTipsOKTipsIreportMHNews@MHMSM-comGraphic

To report a news tip, click the image above or send an email to iReportMHNewsTips@mhmsm.com – To help us spot your message in our volume of email, please put the words NEWS TIP in the subject line.

1) To sign up in seconds for our MH Industry leading emailed news updates, click here.EmailedMHProNewsHeadlineNewsDailyBusinessNews

2) To provide a News Tips and/or Commentary, click the link to the left. Please note if comments are on-or-off the record, thank you.

3) Marketing, Web, Video, Consulting, Recruiting and Training Resources

SoheylaKovachDailyBusinessNewsMHProNewsMHLivingNewsSubmitted by Soheyla Kovach to the Daily Business News for MHProNews.com. Soheyla is a managing member of LifeStyle Factory Homes, LLC, the parent company to MHProNews, and MHLivingNews.com.

 

President Donald J. Trump Proclaims June 2018 as National Homeownership Month, Industry Reaction

June 7th, 2018 Comments off
NationalHomeOwnershipMonthManufacturedHousingIndustryDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews551x311

Still from video, posted further below on this article.

Via a release from the White House Press Room to the Daily Business News, the President of the United States (POTUS), Donald J. Trump, said as follows.

 

— start of extended quote —

PresidentTrumpProclaimsNationalFairHousingMonthApril2018DailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

During National Homeownership Month, we affirm the joy and benefits of homeownership.  For millions of Americans, owning a home is an important step toward financial security and achieving the American Dream.  My Administration is committed to fostering an economic environment in which every family has the opportunity to enjoy the sense of pride and stability that can come with owning a home.

Our Nation’s economy is experiencing tremendous growth.  I signed into law historic tax reform that cut taxes for middle class Americans and small businesses.  My Administration has also slashed unnecessary and burdensome regulations that stunted economic growth.  As a result of these actions, Americans are keeping more of their hard-earned paychecks, unemployment rates are at historic lows, and more Americans are entering the workforce.  Consequently, owning a home is becoming more attainable for many Americans.

Numerous benefits are associated with homeownership.  Owning a home gives Americans a place to call their own, and a place of comfort and safety where they can raise their families.  Homeowners also support local businesses, have a strong vested interest in their communities, and foster bonds of friendship with others who live and work in their neighborhoods.  A home is more than a place to live — it is also an investment in family, in community, and in the long-term prosperity of our great country.

This month, we celebrate those Americans whose success and determination have helped make them homeowners.  Their dedication to their families and communities, and to achieving a brighter and more secure future, is an inspiration to each person who is pursuing their own American Dream.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim June 2018 as National Homeownership Month.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirty-first day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand eighteen, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-second.

DONALD J. TRUMP

— end of extended quote —

Fannie Mae produced a fine video, shown below.  But for all of the lip-service that they’ve been paying to manufactured homes, there’s no hint or mention of it in this video.  Why not?

To return to and surpass the manufactured home (MH) industry’s glory days, MH Pros must learn to look past polite words, posturing, or platitudes, to focus on realities.  For example, by every measure, the president is delivering. We’re proud to have editorially supported him during the primary and general election, and are focused on his results, not rhetoric.

FannieMaeManufacturedHomeAdvantageDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews600

Similarly, we must look at how Fannie Mae is touting on their home page their new Manufactured Home Advantage program. Much of what they say is terrific, and accurate, when it comes to the realities of modern manufactured homes.  But then they are arguably also subtly undermining manufactured housing, when they promote what amounts to the Manufactured Housing Institute’s (MHI) problematic “new class of homes.”

We asked officials at Fannie and MHI about this 2 days ago.  The reply?  Silence.

But others are speaking out.

 

MHI Member Observations

An MHI member/producer emailed the Daily Business News blasted the GSEs for how they’re treating the vast majority of manufactured housing.  It might have been written by MHARR, but it was a MHI-only national association member.

In another message from a MHI producing member, there’s these excerpts from a longer message.

Tony.

Good article on the Trauma issue

“Trailer House Trauma,” Fresh Look at Manufactured Housing’s Opportunities

Secondly, the big change has to come from within and education and honesty.

QUIT describing ourselves as how long, how wide and how much…

 …You want parity with site built homes, then act like it!”

Image…

I check into the Tunica show and asked how many Retailers were attending… the lady looked at me as if I had two heads… when did they start calling them Retailers…”

It is all of our responsibility…I avoid the T word like those that avoid the N word.”

Whenever I hear it [the T word], I tell them that is something you put your boat on…Take care…”

What does it say that so many MH professionals fear speaking out publicly?

 

MHARR on National Home Ownership Month

MarkWeissJDPresidentCEOManufacturedHousingAssocRegulatoryReformDailyBusinessNewsMHProNewsNaturally, the Manufactured Housing Association for Regulatory Reform (MHARR) supports every possible legitimate effort to increase the wealth of renters via home-buying. HUD Secretary Ben Carson pointed out during his tour last year that renting households average only $5000 net worth, while home owners net worth averages some $200,000. While MHARR’s advocacy is for common sense regulatory reform, the ultimate beneficiaries are citizens,” said their President and CEO, Mark Weiss in a message to MHProNews. “Thus, our motto, “Preserving the Dream of Home Ownership through Regulatory Reform.”

That said, educational and marketing efforts are the proper purview of the post-production sector of the industry,” Weiss stated.

The umbrella association that claims to promote the interests of the post-production sector were AWOL last year on National Home Ownership month. They were absent the year before as well, failing to promote the 40th anniversary of the first HUD Code manufactured homes,” the MHARR president said.

There is an urgent need to establish a reality-based post-production representation that isn’t dominated by a few major companies that would seemingly rather see the industry’s consolidation instead of protecting, educating, and promoting solutions that would benefit consumers, industry and save tax payers in the process,” said Weiss.

 

Weiss’ Thoughts, Juxtaposed to Lavin’s and Allen’s

Weiss, Allen, and Lavin have all recent called out the Manufactured Housing Institute for a variety of ways that they posturing helping all segments, but in fact work for the interests of what Lavin calls the big boys.”

Weiss, as well as others are calling for – and some are working towards – a new, post-production representation.

The independent producers of HUD Code manufactured homes already have able representation in MHARR, as the Washington Post, George Washington University, and the SBA have all helped make clear.

 

Greener, Stylish Manufactured Homes – Hidden Facts in the Washington Post Manufactured Housing Narrative

When there’s an affordable housing crisis, and manufactured homes are estimated to do perhaps 100,000 (+/-) new home produced in 2018, what does that say about MHI’s so-called post-production leadership?

2018-06-07_0622ItsADisgraceTheSystemIsRiggedManufacturedHousingIndustryDailyBusinessNewsMHProNews

Screen capture from this morning, at 6:22 AM ET.

POTUS Trump has used the phrase, “The System Is Rigged” many times. Isn’t the MHI system rigged against the interests of most of the independent companies in MHVille? Isn’t it monopolistic when they promote a “new class of homes” that their big three members are producing?

Is it the Trump Administration whose made progress possible in MHVille? Or is it Berkshire Chairman Warren Buffett, who promoted Secretary Clinton, who had she been elected promised to double down on job and small business killing taxes and regulations? Isn’t the MHI system rigged? “We Provide, You Decide.” © ## (News, analysis, and commentary.)

(Third party images, and content, are provided under fair use guidelines.)

Related Reports:

Celebrate National Home Ownership Month, with 26 Cool Prefab Cribs, a $1 Billion Dollar Hybrid Mansion, 4 Fun Videos

 

‘Tip of Iceberg’ – Rick Rand; Marty Lavin, Communities have ‘No Confidence’ in Manufactured Housing Institute, New National Trade Group Announced

 

White House Signing Ceremony on Historic Pro-Growth Financial Regulatory Reform

Doug Schoen, Clinton Adviser, warns – “Democrats must advance an agenda…to create a society of opportunity for all – not guaranteed outcomes achieved through wealth redistribution.”

Warren Wages War

Fed Reports = American Household Net Worth Soar$

NorthStar and Manufactured Housing Radix

George Allen Reply to Mainstream Media re: Roane/Lackey/SECO Exposé, Plus MHI, MHARR, et al – “Make Manufactured Housing Great Again”

 

ConfidentialNewsTipsOKTipsIreportMHNews@MHMSM-comGraphic

To report a news tip, click the image above or send an email to iReportMHNewsTips@mhmsm.com – To help us spot your message in our volume of email, please put the words NEWS TIP in the subject line.

1) To sign up in seconds for our MH Industry leading emailed news updates, click here.EmailedMHProNewsHeadlineNewsDailyBusinessNews

2) To provide a News Tips and/or Commentary, click the link to the left. Please note if comments are on-or-off the record, thank you.

3) Marketing, Web, Video, Consulting, Recruiting and Training Resources

SoheylaKovachDailyBusinessNewsMHProNewsMHLivingNewsSubmitted by Soheyla Kovach to the Daily Business News for MHProNews.com. Soheyla is a managing member of LifeStyle Factory Homes, LLC, the parent company to MHProNews, and MHLivingNews.com.