Click here to send MH news, tips, links, documents, facts
or factory-built housing related news story suggestions.

Home > Analysis and Commentary, Announcements, Legal, regulation > HUD Publishes Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Affirmative Furthering Fair Housing Rule

HUD Publishes Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Affirmative Furthering Fair Housing Rule

August 13th, 2018

HUDBuildingAFFHAffirmativeFurtheringFairHousingRuleDailyBusinessNewsMHproNews

The Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) rule, was put into effect in 2015, during the tenure of former President Obama.

 

The rule required jurisdictions that received Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funding to assess fair housing.

AFFH aimed to identify solutions to discriminatory barriers in housing markets. The Daily Business News on MHProNews reported over a year and a half ago a proposal aimed at what opponents of AFFH called “massive overreach” by HUD.

How Ben Carson Could End Public Housing at HUD

With that background, the following HUD News release to the Daily Business News on MHProNews will be placed in context. The move seems to be in keeping with the Trump Administration executive orders. Notice that HUD is calling for public input on this proposed rulemaking. 

 

HUDGovPressNewsMediaDailyBusinessNewsMHPronEws

HUD SEEKS TO STREAMLINE AND ENHANCE

‘AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING’ RULE

Notice solicits public’s comments on ways to improve fair housing choice

 

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Housing and Urban Development (HUD) today published a notice inviting public comment on amendments to its Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) regulations.  HUD’s goal in pursuing new rulemaking is to offer more helpful guidance to states and local communities to effectively promote fair housing choice through the use of their federal funds.  Read HUD’s Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

As HUD begins the process of amending the existing AFFH regulations, it is soliciting public comment on changes that will: (1) minimize regulatory burden while more effectively aiding program participants to meet their statutory obligations, (2) create a process focused primarily on accomplishing positive results, rather than on analysis, (3) provide for greater local control and innovation, (4) seek to encourage actions that increase housing choice, including through greater housing supply, and (5) more efficiently utilize HUD resources. 

“HUD believes very deeply in the purposes of the Fair Housing Act and that states, local governments, and public housing authorities further fair housing choice,” said HUD Secretary Ben Carson.  “HUD’s 2015 rule often dictated unworkable requirements and actually impeded the development and rehabilitation of affordable housing.”

“It’s ironic that the current AFFH rule, which was designed to expand affordable housing choices, is actually suffocating investment in some of our most distressed neighborhoods that need our investment the most,” Carson continued. “We do not have to abandon communities in need. Instead we believe we can craft a new, fairer rule that creates choices for quality housing across all communities.”

“Today we begin the formal process of examining how we can get this regulation right by first listening and learning from those who must put these rules to work and live with its impact,” Carson concluded.

 

Background

On July 16, 2015, HUD published its AFFH final rule.  The stated purpose of that regulation was to provide HUD program participants with a revised planning approach to assist them in meeting their legal obligation to affirmatively further fair housing.  Since then, HUD found that in contrast to its stated goals, the AFFH rule proved ineffective, highly prescriptive, and effectively discouraged the production of affordable housing. 

Last January, HUD suspended the obligation of local governments to file plans under the regulation and, in May, withdrew a computer assessment tool required to be used by local governments in preparing those plans.  HUD found that rather than assisting local governments in formulating acceptable fair housing assessments, the ‘Local Government Assessment Tool’ was confusing, difficult to use, contained errors, and frequently produced unacceptable assessments, and otherwise required an unsustainable level of technical assistance.  HUD continues to review comments submitted in response to the withdrawal of the Local Government Assessment Tool.  The Department will consider those comments during its consideration of potential changes to the AFFH regulations. ## (News, analysis and commentary.)

(Third party images, content are provided under fair use guidelines.)

 

ConfidentialNewsTipsOKTipsIreportMHNews@MHMSM-comGraphic

To report a news tip, click the image above or send an email to iReportMHNewsTips@mhmsm.com – To help us spot your message in our volume of email, please put the words NEWS TIP in the subject line.

1) To sign up in seconds for our MH Industry leading emailed news updates, click here.EmailedMHProNewsHeadlineNewsDailyBusinessNews

2) To provide a News Tips and/or Commentary, click the link to the left. Please note if comments are on-or-off the record, thank you.

3) Marketing, Web, Video, Consulting, Recruiting and Training Resources

SoheylaKovachDailyBusinessNewsMHProNewsMHLivingNewsSubmitted by Soheyla Kovach to the Daily Business News for MHProNews.com. Soheyla is a managing member of LifeStyle Factory Homes, LLC, the parent company to MHProNews, and MHLivingNews.com.

 

 

 

 

 

Related Reports:

Secretary Carson, HUD Commemorates 50 Years Of The Fair Housing Act, Fair Housing Month

 

Housing, Jobs, Poverty, Opportunity – Kerner Commission Remix, HUD and Manufactured Homes


Matthew Silver - Reporter at Large
Soheyla Kovach - Support Services
L.A. 'Tony' Kovach - Publisher, Editor and Marketing Director. To submit a news tip, please click here: iReportMHNewsTips@MHMSM.com
Comments are closed.